Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of Rhinology ; : 110-113, 2007.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-171125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many people experience problems with a dry nasal mucous membrane, often without wondering why. The cause of problem is known as rhinitis sicca, senile rhinitis, and atrophic rhinitis, etc. A common form of treatment for patients who have such symptoms has been to begin by rinsing the inside of the nose with saline solution, to drop peanut oil, to apply antibiotic-ointment and moisturizing agents. Lanolin has been know as a safe skin moisturizing agent and used to treat dry nose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of lanolin on a group of patients seeking treatment for dryness of the nose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients experiencing problems with dry nasal mucosa were selected from the out-patient clinic. Fifty-seven patients, average age 36.3 years old, were treated with 1:2 mixture of lanolin and vaseline ointment. Thirty-six patients, average age 32.0 years, were treated with vaseline ointment. Both ointments were applied three times a day for two weeks. The efficacy of treatment was determined with pre and post-treatment six symptoms on a visual analogue scale: nasal obstruction, crust formation, mucosal dryness, respiratory discomfort, sleep disturbance, and general discomfort. RESULTS: For subjects treated with lanolin, the average VAS value for nasal obstruction was 5.84+/-2.28 and it decreased to 2.89+/-1.29, while the corresponding values for subjects treated with vaseline were 4.39+/-1.77 decreasing to 3.11+/- 1.24 (p<0.05). Crust formation of lanolin treated subjects were 5.67+/-2.39 and it decreased to 2.09+/-1.46, while the vaseline treated subjects were 4.83+/-1.99 decreasing to 2.33+/-1.31 (p<0.05). Average total symptom improvement was 65.7% (from 27.95+/-9.30 to 9.86+/-4.58) in lanolin treated group, while it was 44.8% (from 20.9+/-76.59 to 11.64+/-4.18) in vaseline treated group. CONCLUSION: We found that the efficacy of lanolin was statistically signigicantly better than that of vaseline. During the study period, there was no local reactions have been reported, nor have any allergic reactions. The present study underlines the fact that the way to treat nasal mucosal dryness is to use lanolin ointment.


Assuntos
Humanos , Hipersensibilidade , Lanolina , Mucosa , Mucosa Nasal , Obstrução Nasal , Nariz , Pomadas , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Vaselina , Rinite , Rinite Atrófica , Pele , Cloreto de Sódio
2.
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery ; : 155-158, 2000.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-650293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Otohematoma is a fairly common disease in otolaryngologic clinics. The principle treatment is composed of removal of the hematoma and compression. But this method is inconvenient both to the patient and doctor. To find another alternative that is simple and easy, we tried steroid injection in otohematoma. Steroid is used in various kinds of hemangioma, and if it is effective in hemangioma it also can be speculated that same phenomenon can be happened to otohematoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred otohematoma patients were treated with triamcinolone injection on the lesion sites after aspiration of hematoma or seroma. The injection was repeated as necessary. RESULT: Among the 100 otohematoma patients 96 patients(96%) were healed without any complications. The numbers of injection needed were usually within 3 times(81%) : 1 time(42%), 2 times (20%), 3 times(19%). CONCLUSION: Steroid injection is a very good alternative in the treatment of otohematoma. It is easy to perform, convenient to the patients and usually results in complete resolution. The proposed mechanisms are vasoconstricting and anti-inflammatory action of steroid.


Assuntos
Humanos , Hemangioma , Hematoma , Seroma , Triancinolona
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA