No effect of interleukin-2 on IgE levels given in addition to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 >300 cells/mm3.

HIV-infected patients may have frequent atopy caused by an imbalance of Th1 and Th2 cytokines. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether IL-2 given in addition to antiretrovirals (ARV) would result in lower IgE levels and less allergic symptoms. Patients naive to IL-2 (n=28) began IL-2 plus ARV and were followed for 12 months. IgE, eosinophil and CD4 counts, HIV RNA, symptom scoring, PFT and skin prick test (SPT) were performed. It was found that the baseline median CD4 and IgE were 386.5 cells/mm3 and 63.5 IU/ml, respectively. Four patients had allergic rhinitis (AR) and 61% had a positive SPT to at least 1 antigen. At month 12, patients had higher CD4 counts (p < 0.001) compared to the baseline; however, there were no differences in IgE levels, allergic symptom scores or HIV RNA. The eosinophil count was higher after IL-2 administration. It was concluded that IL-2 plus ARV resulted in higher CD4 counts but had no effect on atopy.

Significant differences between plasma HIV-1 RNA assays in HIV-1 subtype E infected patients treated with antiretroviral therapy.

A total of 72 HIV-1 infected Thai patients treated with didanosine (ddI) or stavudine (d4T) plus ddI at the time of interim analysis were analyzed. Sixty patients (83%) carried subtype E documented by HIV-1 V3 serotyping. HIV-1 RNA levels were measured using three commercial viral load assays. At baseline (n = 57), Quantiplex 2.0 and NucliSens 2.0 showed mean log10 HIV-1 RNA of 0.7 log10 or 5 fold lower than Amplicor 1.5 (mean 4.29 versus 5.0 log10, respectively, p < 0.001). At week 20 of treatment (n = 29), HIV-1 RNA levels were detected in 55.2%, 31%, and 33.5% of subjects tested by Amplicor 1.5, Quantiplex 2.0, and NucliSens 2.0, respectively. In conclusion: plasma HIV-1 RNA analyses showed comparable values with Quantiplex 2.0 and NucliSens 2.0 assays. In contrast, Amplicor 1.5 resulted in approximately 5 folds higher HIV-1 RNA levels and a 25% higher rate of detection of plasma HIV-1 RNA as compared to the other two assays. As the current goal of therapy is to suppress plasma viral load below the detection limit of the assays, the significant differences between the assays may influence antiretroviral efficacy evaluation and management.