RESUMO
Although post-dates is among the most common indications for induction of labor, no studies have identified the predictors of cesarean section [C/S] in that population. The high cesarean rate in our institution for this group of women triggered us to assess different induction practices to elicit potential causes. We conducted a hospital-based retrospective cohort analysis using chart reviews of all nullipara women with induced labor at the Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, during the 2-year period, April 1998 to March 2000. The C/S rate was compared among 3 groups of women who were divided according to their induction method. Three hundred and thirty-nine women meeting the inclusion criteria were induced. Of the 25 women who received oxytocin ideally and the 111 women who did not, 7 [28%] and 53 [48%] were delivered by C/S, [x2=3.228 p=0.07; relative risks 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.30, 1.13]]. A significantly lower C/S rate [x2=21.9, p<0.0005] was found among women induced with prostaglandin [PG] alone [19.4%] compared with those induced with PG and oxytocin, whether oxytocin was given ideally [38.3%] or not ideally [45.4%]. Of women who received oxytocin, there was no difference in chorioamnionitis [x2=0.485, p=0.49] between those who had an early membrane rupture [with or pre-oxytocin, 22.4%] and those who had membrane rupture following a period of oxytocin infusion [18.5%]. The need for oxytocin or less than 2 doses of PG is associated with increased risk of C/S. Whether oxytocin was given according to protocol [ideally] or not, made no difference to the C/S risk in this population