Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of Experimental Hematology ; (6): 1449-1453, 2016.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-332671

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the effects of valproic acid(VPA) on the expression of intracellular domain of Notch1 (ICN1) and Hes1 in multiple myeloma RPMI 8226 cell line.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Experiments were divided into 4 group: blank control group and groups of cells treated with VPA of different concentration (2, 4, 8 mmol/L), the cell proliferation was detected by MTT method, RT-PCR was applied to detect the mRNA expression level of ICN1 and Hes1. Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of ICN1 and Hes1.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The proliferation of the RPMI 8226 cell was obviously inhibited by different concentration of VPA (2, 4, 8 mmol/L) at the same time. The same concentration of VPA was used to treat RPMI8226 cell for different time (24, 48, 72 h), the cell proliferation was obviously inhibited. Compared with control group, the mRNA and protein expression of ICN1 was significantly depressed at different concentration of VPA(2, 4, 8 mmol/L) for 48 h (P<0.05). Compared with control group, the mRNA and protein expression of Hes1 was depressed at different concentration 2, 4, 8 mmol/L)of VPA for 48 h (P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>VPA inhibits the proliferation of the RPMI 8226 cell in a time- and dose- dependent manner; VPA down-regulates the mRNA and protein expression level of ICN1 and Hes1 in RPMI8226 cell; thus VPA might inhibit cell proliferation possibly through the inhibition of Notch signaling pathway in multiple myeloma cells.</p>

2.
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ; (12): 464-466, 2006.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-357786

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the role of probiotics in the prevention of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and to investigate the risk factors for NEC.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 2528 hospitalized neonates between January 2002 and May 2005 were assigned into either receiving prophylactic use of probiotics bifoco (Prevention group, n=1182) or without probiotics supplementation (Control group, n = 1346). The incidence of NEC was compared between the two groups. The risk factors for NEC were investigated by conditional logistic regression multifactorial analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 19 cases of NEC in the Control group (1.41%), but only 6 cases in the Prevention group (0.51%) (P < 0.05). Gestational age (OR = 5.521), hypoxicdouble ended arrowischemic encephalopathy (OR = 3.887), specticemia (OR = 4.854) and critical illness scores (OR = 5.989) were the risk factors for NEC, while the prophylactic use of probiotics was an independent protective factor for NEC (OR = 0.255).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The prophylactic use of probiotics may reduce the incidence of NEC in neonates.</p>


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Enterocolite Necrosante , Probióticos , Usos Terapêuticos
3.
Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics ; (24)2006.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-639373

RESUMO

Objective To explore the risk factors of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)and assess the effect of prophylactic use of probiotics(Bifico)in prevention of NEC and observe changes of weight.Methods Five hundred and twenty-four cases of prematures who were inpatients were divided into 2 groups randomly(prevention group,n=276,no-prevention group,n=248)and the morbidity of NEC and the increase of eight during hospitalization were observed.A case-control study and conditional Logistic regression model multifactorial analysis were made to 20 cases NEC neonates and 80 cases non-NEC neonates.Results The prevention group(276 cases)had 5 cases of NEC and the average weight increase was(8.114?8.137)g/d,the no-prevention group 248 cases had 17 cases of NEC,and the average weight increase was(6.595?5.337)g/d.The occure rate of NEC in prevention group was significantly lower than that of no-prevention group(?2=5.57 P

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA