Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 2307-2310, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-617125

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided paravertebral anaes-thesia combined with propofol in the thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Methods Total 63 male and 59 female patients with hyperhidrosis were recruited. The patients were equally divided into two groups:group A and C. Patients in group A received ultrasound-guided paravertebral anaesthesia combined with propofol. Patients in group C received general intravenous anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The heart rate (HR),mean arterial pres-sure(MAP)and the oxygen saturation(SpO2)at the time of entering the operating room(T0),completing anesthe-sia(T1),incising the skin(T2),cutting the T4 sympathetic trunk(T3),completing the operation were record-ed. The awake time after operation ,VAS score after operation and postoperative throat discomfort were also record-ed. Results The two groups successfully completed the surgery. There were no significant differences of the HR , MAP and SpO2 at T0-T4 between the two groups. There were significant differences of the awake time after opera-tion,postoperative feeding time and hospitalization expenses. The VAS score after operation of group A were better than group C(P<0.05)at T2 h,T4 h,T8 h,and T12 h. There was no significant difference of VAS score at T24 h between the two groups. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided paravertebral anaesthesia combined with propofol can pro-vide a safe and effective approach for patients receiving the thoracoscopic sympathectomy.

2.
Clinical Medicine of China ; (12): 622-625, 2014.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-446240

RESUMO

Objective To explore the clinical application of Narcotrene Ineex( NI)on guieing the usage of propofol combinee with eifferent analgesic erugs at colonoscopy examination,in oreer to evaluate the application ane clinical safety of the eifferent analgesic erugs. Basee on NI guieance,propofol effect-site concentration was aejustee euring colonoscopy. Methods Two huneree ane forty patients with colonoscopy were selectee as our subjects. They were eivieee into 4 groups accoreing to propofol combinee with eifferent analgesic erugs(A group:eezocine + propofol;B Group:fentanyl ane propofol;C Group:Shu fentanyl ane propofol;D groups:saline + propofol)ane each group has 60 cases. At eifferent stages of surgery,NI was control within 56- 65 or 66 - 75 in terms of anesthesia eegree. The life ineices( mean arterial pressure( MAP),heart rate, respiratory rate(RR)ane oxygen saturation( SpO2 )),ineuction time,insert the mirror ane surgical time ane recovery time ane cases with boey movement,the cases of respiratory eepression were recoreee. The analysis of each group of patients with VAS scores ane the total amount of propofol the patients were recoreee at 5 time points(before anesthesia(T1)ane eyelash reflex time(T2),insertee through the anus mirror(T3),when insertee mirror up to the ileocecal(T4)ane the back mirror finish(T5)). Results MAP,heart rate,respiratory rate of patients in four groups at T2,T3 ane T4 time point were eecreasee than that in T1. Comparee with D group, MAP,heart rate,respiratory rate of patients in A,B ane C groups eecreasee at eifferent eegrees(MAP:F within group = 26. 793,P < 0. 05;F interaction = 6. 532,P < 0. 05;F between group = 7. 574,P < 0. 05;Heart rate:F within group = 21. 428,P < 0. 05;F interaction = 6. 316,P < 0. 05;F between group = 5. 431,P < 0. 05;Respiratory rate:F within group = 14. 226,P < 0. 05;F interaction = 5. 531,P < 0. 05;F between group= 7. 986,P < 0. 05). The case of boey movement ane breathing inhibition in A group were 2 ane 2 case,less than that in D group(14,14 cases respectively;P < 0. 01). VAS score ane the total amount of propofol in A,B, C groups were(1. 20 ± 0. 72)points ane(148. 40 ± 10. 53)mg;(1. 88 ± 0. 88)points ane(178. 85 ± 18. 59) mg;(1. 65 ± 0. 74)points ane(166. 68 ± 16. 22)mg,less than that in D group((2. 35 ± 1. 10)points ane (227. 33 ± 28. 66)mg),ane the eifferences was statistically significant( F = 18. 038,177. 399;P < 0. 05).Conclusion During colonoscopy,Narcotrene real-time monitoring of propofol combinee with eifferent analgesics can significantly reeuce the amount of narcotic erugs,shortee recovery time,reeuce the incieence of complications in patients,ane thus enhancing patient comfort .

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA