Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 30: e20220108, 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1386007

RESUMO

Abstract Filling materials should be restricted to the root canal space. However, sometimes it is impossible to control the apical extrusion, in this case, the fate of the filling material and the result of the treatment will depend on its physicochemical properties and biocompatibility. Objective To evaluate the tissue response and bone repair capacity of endodontic sealers that were implanted in the calvaria of Wistar rats, forming the groups (n=16): AH Plus and Sealer Plus, compared to the clot group. Methodology On days 30 and 60, the animals were euthanized, the calvaria was removed and processed for hematoxylin-eosin, immunohistochemistry for collagen type I, Picrosirus red and microtomographic analysis. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tuckey tests (p<0.05). Results At 30 days, all groups showed an intense inflammatory reaction (p>0.05). At 60 days, the AH Plus and Sealer Plus maintained an intense inflammatory infiltrate compared to the clot group (p<0.05). We observed immunopositive areas for type I collagen in all groups at 30 days and 60 days (p>0.05). We observed more red collagen fibers for the Sealer Plus compared to the clot group at 30 days (p<0.05). Considering the total fibers, the clot group at 30 days compared to 60 days after surgery showed an increase in the amount of matrix (p<0.05). There were no statistical differences between groups for green and yellow fibers (p>0.05). Regarding morphometric parameters, at 30 days, the newly formed bone volume and number of bone trabeculae were higher in the groups with sealers compared to the clot group (p<0.05). At 60 days, AH Plus and Sealer Plus showed greater bone neoformation compared to the clot group (p<0.05). Conclusions Despite AH Plus and Sealer Plus induced an intense inflammatory reaction, they can be considered biocompatible materials, since they allowed bone repair.

2.
Rev. Salusvita (Online) ; 40(3): 166-172, 2021.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1412375

RESUMO

O objetivo do presenteestudo foi avaliar a atividade antibacteriana dos cimentos endodôn-ticos MTA Fillapex, Sealapex, Sealer 26 e Endofill puros e acrescidos de amoxicilina e ci-profloxacina frente a duas linhagens ATCC de Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212 e ATCC 4083). Os testes foram realizados pela técnica de difusão radial dos cimentos aplicados di-retamente no ágar e impregnados em discos de papel e pelo teste de contato direto. Para a análise estatística, utilizaram-se os testes de ANOVA e Tukey com nível de significância de 5%. Os resultados mostraram que pela técnica da difusão radial, considerando os cimentos puros, o Sealapex foi o único que apresentou halos de inibição frente às duas linhagens. Já quando da associação de amoxicilina e ciprofloxacina, o MTA Fillapex revelou os melhores halos de inibição para as duas linhagens. Todos os cimentos tiveram a ação potencializada pela adição dos antibióticos (p<0,05). Pela técnica de difusão dos cimentos impregnados em discos de papel, o cimento Sealapex puro fresco demonstrou atividade antimicrobiana em todas as variáveis de tempo. Quando acrescidos dos antibióticos, todos os cimentos ti-veram a ação antimicrobiana potencializada pelas drogas, em todas as variáveis de tempo. Esse mesmo resultado foi observado na técnica do contato direto dos cimentos com ambas as linhagens. A atividade antibacteriana, frente ao E. faecalis, dos cimentos MTA Fillapex, Endofill, Sealer e Sealapex, acrescidos dos antibióticos amoxicilina e ciprofloxacina, foi potencializada mesmo após um longo período da presa dos cimentos.


The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of different endodon-tic cements (MTA Fillapex, Sealapex, Sealer 26, and Endofill), both pure and mixed with 5% of amoxicillin or ciprofloxacin, against two strains of Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212 and ATCC 4083). Bacterial susceptibility testing was conducted by radial diffusion methods and direct contact test after different periods. Data were subjected to ANO-VA and Tukey test with a significance level of 5%. Sealapex was the only pure sealer to promote the inhibition of bacterial growth against both strains in different experimental periods. However, all cements present an increase in antibacterial activity by the addition of antibiotics (p<0.05). MTA Fillapex and Sealapex associated with amoxicillin promoted increased values for bacterial growth against ATCC 29212 and ATCC 4083 in comparison to other groups (p<0.001), including extended periods after setting time. The association of antibiotic agents increased the antibacterial effect of the evaluated sealers against the strains of E. faecalis.


Assuntos
Endodontia/instrumentação , Enterococcus faecalis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA