Demineralized dentin matrix technique - a comparison of different demineralizing solutions

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the microstructure formed after the chemical treatment of teeth, for the development of autogenous grafts from the demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) technique, in order to identify the most efficient demineralizing solution. The specimens, originating from the root and coronal portion, were submitted to ultrasonic cleaning and drying in an oven for 1h at 100 ºC. Then, the density was determined by Archimedes' principle for each specimen, using distilled water as immersion liquid. The samples were separated into five groups: Control group: negative control, Distilled water;EDTA group: positive control, trisodium EDTA; NaOCl group: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite; HCl-0.6M group: 0.6M hydrochloric acid; and H2O2/H2SO4 group: hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid. Each specimen was immersed for 1h in the corresponding group descaling solution at 60 ºC. Subsequently, the mass loss and density of the treated specimens were determined by Archimedes' principle. Ultimately, the specimens of each group were characterized by microtomography, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Energy Dispersive Spectrometry X-ray (SEM-EDS). The results demonstrated that the H2O2/H2SO4 solution allowed the formation of interconnected micropores, suggesting better pore structures for application in scaffolds, when compared to the other studied solutions.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a microestrutura formada após o tratamento químico em dentes, para o desenvolvimento de enxertos autógenos a partir da técnica de matriz de dentina desmineralizada (DDM), a fim de identificar a solução desmineralizante mais eficiente. Os espécimes, provenientes da raiz e porção coronal, foram submetidos à limpeza ultrassônica e secagem em estufa por 1h a 100 ºC. Em seguida, a densidade foi determinada pelo princípio de Arquimedes para cada espécime, utilizando água destilada como líquido de imersão. As amostras foram separadas em cinco grupos: Controle: controle negativo, Água destilada; EDTA: controle positivo, EDTA trissódico; NaOCl: hipoclorito de sódio 2,5%; HCl-0.6M: ácido clorídrico 0,6M; e H2O2/H2SO4: peróxido de hidrogênio e ácido sulfúrico. Cada espécime foi imerso por 1h na solução descalcificante de grupo correspondente a 60 ºC. Posteriormente, a perda de massa e a densidade dos espécimes tratados foram determinadas pelo princípio de Arquimedes. Por fim, os espécimes de cada grupo foram caracterizados por microtomografia, microscopia eletrônica de varredura e espectrometria de energia dispersiva de raios-X (SEM-EDS). Os resultados demonstraram que a solução H2O2/H2SO4 permitiu a formação de microporos interligados, sugerindo melhores estruturas de poros para aplicação em scaffolds, quando comparada às demais soluções estudadas.

Protein interactions with osseointegrable titanium implants

This review aims to present the mechanisms of protein interactions with titanium dental implant surfaces. Methods: the analyses were based on searches of scientific articles available in English and Portuguese in PubMed (MEDLINE), Bireme (LILACS), Scielo, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Results: titanium dental implant treatments success rates (95-98%) are mainly due to the biocompatibility of titanium oxide on the implant surface, surgical techniques adopted, good implants manufacturing processes and biomechanical knowledge of the systems. Studies in past decades has empirically developed implant surfaces with significant changes in morphologies, roughness, wettability, surface energy, chemical composition, and chemical groups density or deposited molecules. These changes promoted better protein adsorption, osteoblast adhesion, and changes in the mechanisms involved in osseointegration. Thus, the time to put the implant in function has been reduced and the success rates have increased. In the osseointegration process, at the nanoscale, there is no contact between the bone and the implant surface, but there is the formation of a protein anchorage between the periosteum and the implant with an interface formed by proteins. In all the reactions between the body and the implant surface, the activities of fibronectin and integrin are essential, since they are responsible for transmitting information to the cell for its differentiation, adhesion and mobility. Conclusion: thus, the analyses of protein-implant interactions are indispensable for a better understanding of the performance of osseointegrated dental implants