Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Braz. dent. j ; 33(1): 112-118, jan.-fev. 2022. graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1364478

RESUMO

Resumo Este relato de caso descreve o tratamento e acompanhamento de um molar inferior em uma jovem de 18 anos com cisto periapical. Assim, torna-se importante saber quais opções devemos tomar diante de uma situação clínica que não podemos resolver pelos métodos convencionais, e quais técnicas e abordagens temos para alcançar o sucesso do tratamento. Este caso mostrou o plano de tratamento e acompanhamento, por meio de imagens de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC), de um molar inferior previamente tratado com grande abscesso periapical e lesão cística, no qual, a primeira abordagem do plano de tratamento foi fazer o retratamento endodôntico. Durante o preparo químico-mecânico a presença de exsudato purulento intracanal permanente impossibilitou a secagem dos canais, impedindo a obturação do sistema de canais radiculares. Devido a essa situação clínica, foi realizada abordagem cirúrgica com a intenção de reduzir esse exsudato permanente e executar uma técnica de descompressão. Após um ano de acompanhamento, os achados clínicos e radiográficos indicaram processo de reparo.


Abstract This case describes the treatment and follow-up of a mandibular molar in an 18-year-old female with a periapical cyst. Thus, it becomes important to know which options should we take when faced with a clinical situation that we cannot resolve through conventional methods, and which techniques and approaches we have to achieve treatment success. This case showed the treatment plan and follow-up, by the use of CBCT images, from a previously treated mandibular molar with a large periapical abscess and cystic lesion, in which, the first treatment plan approach was to make the endodontic retreatment. During the chemo-mechanical preparation the presence of permanent intracanal purulent exudate made it impossible to dry the canals, impeding obturation of the root canal system. Due to this clinical situation, a surgical approach was performed with the intention of reduce this permanent exudate and to execute a decompression technique. Clinical findings, periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomographic, indicated almost complete resolution of the radiolucency, after a one-year follow-up.

2.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 34: e039, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1100935

RESUMO

Abstract To compare the shaping ability of different single-file systems in the preparation of mesial curved canals of mandibular molars using micro-CT technology. Fifteen mesial roots of mandibular molars with two independent and curved canals (n = 30) were selected, scanned at a resolution of 26.7 μm anatomically matched, and distributed into three groups (n = 10), according to the preparation system: WaveOne 25.08, Reciproc 25.08, and OneShape 25.06. A final micro-CT scanning was performed, data sets were registered with their respective counterparts, and compared regarding the three-dimensional (volume, surface area, and structure model index - SMI) and two-dimensional (perimeter, area, roundness, major and minor diameters) parameters, as well as, canal transportation, using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (α = 5%). Overall, no difference was observed between groups regarding area, perimeter, volume, surface area, and canal transportation (p > 0.05). Within group, no canal transportation was significantly higherobserved in the apical third (0.10 ± 0.05 mm) compared to coronal (0.08±0.040 mm) and middle (0.07 ± 0.03 mm) thirds (p < 0.05). Structure model index (SMI) was statistically higher after preparation with OneShape instrument (0.36 ± 0.26) compared to other systems (p < 0.05). Within the parameters of this study, similar shaping ability was observed in the preparation of mesial curved root canals of mandibular molars with Reciproc, OneShape and WaveOne systems.


Assuntos
Humanos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Cavidade Pulpar/anatomia & histologia , Cavidade Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagem , Valores de Referência , Teste de Materiais , Análise de Variância , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Instrumentos Odontológicos , Desenho de Equipamento , Microtomografia por Raio-X/métodos , Dente Molar/anatomia & histologia
3.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180556, 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1019971

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation on physicochemical properties of AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, ADSeal, GuttaFlow Bioseal, and GuttaFlow 2 sealers. Methodology: Three experimental groups were formed: no activation (NA), ultrasonic activation (UA), and sonic activation (SA). The sealers were manipulated according to the manufacturers' instructions. A 3-mL syringe was adapted to receive 1 mL of sealer. Activation was performed with a 20/.01 ultrasonic insert (20 s/1W) in the UA group. A size 35.04 sonic tip was used (20 s/10,000 cycles/min-1) in the SA group. The molds for physicochemical analysis were filled and evaluated according to ANSI/ADA specification no. 57: setting time (ST), flow (FL), dimensional change (DC), solubility (SB), and radiopacity (RD). Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal-Wallis, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey's tests (P<0.05). Results: Regarding ST, only AH Plus and GuttaFlow 2 in the NA group met the ANSI/ADA standards. All FL values were greater than 20 mm in diameter, as determined by ANSI/ADA. The tested sealers and protocols did not comply with the ANSI/ADA standards for DC. As for SB, only MTA Fillapex, regardless of the activation protocol, did not follow the ANSI/ADA standards. All of the investigated sealers, regardless of the activation protocol, presented radiographic density higher than 3 mm Al, as proposed by ANSI/ADA. Conclusions: UA and SA promoted changes in the physicochemical properties of the evaluated root canal sealers, mainly in ST and F. Thus, it is important to evaluate the physicochemical properties of endodontic sealers associated with activation techniques prior to clinical application in order to determine whether the properties follow the parameters set by ANSI/ADA, ensuring safety and quality of root canal filling.


Assuntos
Óxidos/química , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/química , Silicatos/química , Compostos de Cálcio/química , Compostos de Alumínio/química , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/química , Resinas Epóxi/química , Ondas Ultrassônicas , Guta-Percha/química , Valores de Referência , Solubilidade , Propriedades de Superfície , Fatores de Tempo , Teste de Materiais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Variância , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Combinação de Medicamentos
4.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31: e72, 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-952078

RESUMO

Abstract To assess the physicochemical properties of AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow BioSeal, and MM Seal, five samples of each root canal sealer were evaluated to determine their setting time (ST), dimensional change (DC), solubility (SL), flow (FL), and radiopacity (RD) according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA) Specification 57. The distilled and deionized water obtained from the SL test were subjected to atomic absorption spectrometry to observe the presence of Ca2+, K+, and Na+ ions. Statistical analysis was performed by using one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer tests (p < 0.05). The following results were obtained: ST (min) (AH Plus 463.6 ± 13.22; GuttaFlow 2 24.35 ± 2.78; GuttaFlow Bioseal 17.4 ± 0.55; MM Seal 47.60 ± 4.39), DC (%) (AH Plus 0.06 ± 0.12; GuttaFlow 2 −26.06 ± 1.24; GuttaFlow Bioseal 2.10 ± 1.47; MM Seal 8.47 ± 2.41), SL (%) (AH Plus 0.41 ± 0.21; GuttaFlow 2 5.13 ± 4.11; GuttaFlow Bioseal 3.03 ± 1.05; MM Seal 0.94 ± 0.17), FL (mm) (AH Plus 36.42 ± 0.40; GuttaFlow 2 36.44 ± 0.05; GuttaFlow Bioseal 35.4 ± 0.03; MM Seal 52.75 ± 0.60), and RD (mmAl) (AH Plus 7.52 ± 1.59; GuttaFlow 2 6.85 ± 0.14; GuttaFlow Bioseal 7.02 ± 0.18; MM Seal 3.32 ± 0.90). ST, DC, SL, FL, and RD showed statistical differences among the root canal sealers (p < 0.05). As AH Plus showed the lowest DC and SL values (p < 0.05), the findings indicate that this sample is the only sealer conforming to ANSI/ADA standards.


Assuntos
Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/química , Silicones/química , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/química , Resinas Epóxi/química , Guta-Percha/química , Valores de Referência , Solubilidade , Espectrofotometria Atômica , Propriedades de Superfície , Fatores de Tempo , Teste de Materiais , Análise de Variância , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Combinação de Medicamentos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA