RESUMO
Coronary embolism due to atherosclerotic debris is a rather common cause of post-procedural complications. While evidence has shown that both arteriolar vasodilators and platelet glycoprotein inhibitors have proven ineffective against post- and peri-procedural embolism,5 mechanical interventional devices have been shown to improve (lower) 30-day MACE rates. These interventions include distal filtration, distal, and proximal occlusion balloons. The distal occlusion balloon was the first approach to embolic protection. The intervention involves placement of a low pressure (<2 atm) balloon distal to the lesion of interest. Antegrade flow is temporarily interrupted while the lesion is treated. Mounted on conventional 0.014-inch guidewire shafts, distal filtration systems follow a similar intervention method to distal occlusion. In this proceeding, a delivery/recovery sheath catheter deploys an expandable filter device approximating the lumen, which is later removed following PTCA or stent placement in retroversion. The variety of existing, rather novel filter designs typically feature a wire mounted umbrella-type filter consisting of laser-drilled micropores design varied, averaging approximately 100 microm. The primary benefit derived of distal filtration includes the trivial uninterruption of antegrade flow. Unlike distal occlusion, proximal devices allow for vessel protection before lesion crossing, a great advantage in cases involving thrombosis, vulnerable plaque, or primary unstable angina. Proximal occlusion follows a nearly identical implementation as distal occlusion. While substantial research is still needed, interventionalists are advised to always use embolic protection devices in SVG interventions.