RESUMO
To study the Priority of Spinal versus general anesthesia for Caesarian-Section In the eyes of gynecologist and patient in Islam Teaching Hospital Sialkot, Shahina Jamil Hospital Abbottabad and CMH Mangla. Retrospective study. This study was carried out at the Islam Teaching Hospital Sialkot, Shahina Jamil Teaching Hospital Abbottabad and CMH Mangla from 1[st] January 2010 to 28 Feb 2014. 250 cases each for Caesarian Section were taken from government hospitals and private hospitals these were analyzed for type of anesthesia with its preference in the eyes of gynecologists and patients. Fully informed written consent had already been taken for type of anesthesia. Permission was also taken from authorities of above mentioned hospitals for the study. In government hospitals the gynecologist preferred [74%] spinal anesthesia for Cesarion section as compared to private hospitals where he/she preferred general anesthesia [85.6%]. It was concluded that the Gynaecologist in the government sector prefers spinal Anesthesia for Caesarian Section but in private practice she / he prefers general anesthesia for Caesarian section. It was seen that the religious women prefer general anesthesia for caesarian section due to modesty reasons but women of modern society listen to the counseling for spinal anesthesia with open mind. The Anesthetist preferred spinal anesthesia for Caesarian section in most of the cases
RESUMO
To study the incidence of Inguinal Hernia with relation to age, sex, occupation, socio economic status, dietary habits and urban or Rural area of District Sialkot and its peripheral districts. Original study. This study was conducted at Islam Teaching Hospital Sialkot from 1[st] January 2012 to 31[st] December 2012. 100 cases of Inguinal Hernia were selected randomly from patients attending to OPD and emergency of Islam Teaching Hospital Sialkot. The result are shown in the Table No. 1 to Table No. 6. There was maximum percentage of Inguinal Hernia in age group 10-20 years [24%] and minimum in age group 81-90 years [04%] [Table No. 1]. The incidence of Inguinal Hernia was maximum in male [80%] as compared to female [20%] as shown in Table No. 2. There was maximum incidence of Inguinal Hernia in students [28%] and in factory workers, laborers, farmers was [20%] in each group and minimum in shop keepers and service men [06%] in each group as shown in Table No. 3. The incidence of Inguinal Hernia was maximum in people of low socio economic status [50%], [35%] in middle class and [15%] in people of high class as shown in Table No. 5. The incidence of Inguinal Hernia was [66%] in patients on low fibre diet and [34%] in patients on normal fibre diet as shown in Table No. 4. The incidence of Inguinal Hernia was [70%] in patients coming from rural area and [30%] in patients coming from Urban area as shown in Table No. 6
RESUMO
To study the incidence of appendicitis with relation to age, sex, occupation, socio economic status, dietary habits and urban or rural area of district Sialkot. Retrospective study. This study was conducted at the Islam Teaching Hospital Sialkot from 1[st] January 2012 to 31 December 2012. 100 cases of appendicitis were randomly selected from the patients attending to OPD and emergency of Islam Teaching Hospital Sialkot and its peripheral Districts. The data was collected on written pro forma and analyzed for results. In this study the incidence of appendicitis was the highest 39 % at the age 11 - 20 years and the lowest at the age of 71 - 80 years [03 %] It was seen that incidence of appendicitis was 52 % [52 cases] in male and 48 % [48 cases] in female as shown in Table No.2. The incidence was the highest in students 36 % [36 cases] as compared to business man 03 % [03 cases] as shown in Table No.3. In this study the incidence of appendicitis was 37 % [37 cases] in people having high fiber diet as compared to those people who had low fiber diet 63 % [63 cases] as shown in Table No 4. The incidence of appendicitis was 62 % [62 cases] in people living in urban area has compared to people living in rural area 38 % [38 cases] which was half of the urban area as shown in Table No 5. At the last it was seen that the incidence was 60 % [60 cases] in lower class and 40 % [40 cases] high gentry as shown in Table No 6. The incidence of appendicitis is much more in 11-20 year of age and Males were more prone as compare to Female. Students and laborers were more prone as compared to other groups of patients. Low fiber dietary habits were more in percentage as compared to patient having high fibre dietary habits and percentage of patients of appendicitis were double in Urban area as compared to rural area. The incidence of appendicitis was more in patients of low socio economic status as compared to high socio economic status