Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research ; : 288-298, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-49038

RESUMO

Allergy to antibiotics is an important worldwide problem, with an estimated prevalence of up to 10% of the population. Reaction patterns for different antibiotics have changed in accordance with consumption trends. Most of the allergic reactions to antibiotics have been reported for betalactams, followed by quinolones and macrolides and, to a lesser extent, to others, such as metronidazole clindamycin and sulfonamides. The diagnostic procedure includes a detailed clinical history, which is not always possible and can be unreliable. This is usually followed by in vivo, skin, and drug provocation tests. These are not recommended for severe, potentially lifethreaten reactions or for drugs that are known to produce a high rate of false positive results. Given the limitations of in vivo tests, in vitro test can be helpful for diagnosis, despite having suboptimal sensitivity. The most highly employed techniques for diagnosing immediate reactions to antibiotics are immunoassays and basophil activation tests, while lymphocyte transformation tests are more commonly used to diagnose non-immediate reactions. In this review, we describe different in vitro techniques employed to diagnose antibiotic allergy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Basófilos , Clindamicina , Diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade , Imunoensaio , Técnicas In Vitro , Ativação Linfocitária , Macrolídeos , Metronidazol , Prevalência , Quinolonas , Pele , Sulfonamidas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA