Comparison of cardiac output in OPCAB: bolus thermodilution technique versus pulse contour analysis.

The study was designed to evaluate the clinical agreement between intermittent bolus thermodilution technique and pulse contour analysis technique. Sixty patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing elective off-pump coronary bypass surgery were included in this prospective study. In addition to routine monitoring, a 7.5F pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter via right internal jugular vein and a 4F arterial thermodilution catheter into femoral artery were also placed. Cardiac output measurements were compared before induction, after induction, after sternotomy, during the various anastomoses, post-protamine and post-sternal closure. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of agreement to assure bias distribution of differences between the two methods by using Bland and Altman analysis. The cardiac output values obtained at preinduction, post-induction, and post-sternal closure time points showed good agreement, whereas the values obtained during the various anastomoses showed significant differences (p <0.05). Therefore it was concluded that pulse contour analysis cannot be relied upon completely whenever there is a change in the position of heart or alteration in systemic vascular resistance. But the trends in cardiac output were in complete agreement during the entire procedure.

Is off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery safe for left main coronary artery stenosis?

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has been well demonstrated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 1997 and December 2000, 174 patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without a pump. During the same period, 991 patients who also had significant left main coronary artery stenosis underwent coronary artery surgery on a pump. The patients in the two groups were matched in preoperative variables except that those in the off-pump group were slightly older, and more required urgent surgery. Hospital mortality was 2/174 and 21/991 in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively (p=0.560). The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (1.74 v. 14/991, p=0.712), atrial fibrillation (17/174 v 157/991, p=0.050) and blood transfusion requirement (63/174 v. 476/991, p=0.05) were significantly less in the off-pump group. The intubation time (15+/-3 hours v 22+/-4 hours, p=0.001), blood loss (365+/-61 ml v 582+/-76 ml, p<0.001), intensive care unit stay (23+/-10 hours v. 36+/-11 hours, p<0.001) and hospital stay (6+/-4 days v. 9+/-5 days, p <0.001) were also less in the off-pump group. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is safe and effective for patients with left main coronary artery disease.