Efficacy and safety of gefitinib or docetaxel in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed previous platinum-based first-line chemotherapy / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy and safety of gefitinib or docetaxel in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed previous platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively reviewed 222 Chinese NSCLC patients in the subgroup of INTEREST (gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer) study. Survival analysis was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) was used to compare the quality of life between gefitinib group and docetaxel group.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 222 patients were analyzed in this subgroup study. 107 patients were treated with gefitinib, and 115 patients treated with docetaxel. There were all balanced between the two groups in terms of sex, age, staging and pathology in patient characteristics. The median overall survival in the two groups was similar (11 months in the gefitinib group vs. 14.0 months in the docetaxel group, P = 0.783). The progression-free survival (PFS) was also similar between the two groups (median PFS: 3.4 months in gefitinib group vs. 3.8 months in docetaxel group, P = 0.214). The response rate in gefitinib group was significantly higher than that in the docetaxel group (21.9% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.016).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The efficacy of gefitinib is similar with that of docetaxel in pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, however, gefitinib is more favorable in the tolerance and quality of life improvement.</p>

Efficacy and safety of Erlotinib in the treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese patients / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the efficacy and the adverse effects of erlotinib in the treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Chinese patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From November 2005 to March 2009, a total of 519 patients with unresectable, local advanced, relapsed or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled in the trial. All the patients were treated with erlotinib 150 mg/day until disease progression or intolerable toxicity or for other reasons. The response rate, time to disease progression, overall survival and toxicity were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of these 519 patients, 1 case had complete response, 127 cases had partial response and 263 cases had stable disease, resulting in an overall response rate (CR + PR) of 26.7%, disease stable rate of 54.9% and disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) of 81.6%. The median time to progression was 6.44 months and median overall survival was 15.37 months. The major erlotinib treatment-related adverse events (AE) were mild (CTC AE 1/2), only 3 cases had severe adverse effect, 1 case had interstitial lung disease and died of respiratory failure.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The study presents excellent response rates, time to progression and overall survival of erlotinib treatment for advanced NSCLC in Chinese patients, and its adverse events are tolerable.</p>

Gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment over a 3-week versus a 4-week dosing schedule: a randomized trial conducted in Chinese patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a standard treatment for stages IIIB and IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized phase II study evaluated a 3-week versus a 4-week schedule of gemcitabine-cisplatin as first line treatment for Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus either gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (3-week group) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (4-week group).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>One hundred patients were enrolled in this study. The response rate was 24% (12/51 patients) in the 3-week group and 27% (13/49 patients) in the 4-week group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in survival (hazard ratio: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.68 - 2.09) with a median survival of 12.1 months and 13.8 months in the 3-week group and the 4-week group respectively. The rate of grade 3/4 toxicity in the 3-week group was 55% compared with 86% in the 4-week group (P = 0.001). The difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 haematological toxicities did not reach statistical significance (3-week: 37%, 4-week: 57%), however grade 3/4 drug related neutropenia (3-week: 27%, 4-week: 51%) and thrombocytopenia (3-week: 8%, 4-week: 31%) were significantly lower in the 3-week group. Grade 3/4 nonhaematological toxicities were less in the 3-week group (33% cf 63%; P = 0.005).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The differences in the efficacy endpoints were all in favour of the 4-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, however these differences did not reach statistical significance. Fewer grade 3/4 toxicities were observed in the 3-week group compared with the 4-week group.</p>

Clinical benefit of gemcitabine plus cisplatin 3-week regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Platinum-based chemotherapy has been proved effective in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEM-Cis) 3-week regimen in routine care of Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Two hundred and twenty-one patients with NSCLC stage IIIb or IV were enrolled and 209 were eligible for effectiveness and safety analysis. The median age was 58 (range 29 to 79) years. The percents of cases in stage IV and stage IIIb were 52.2% and 47.8%; of Karnofsky performance score (KPS) less than 80 and 80 - 100 were 37.3% and 62.7% and of adeno-cancer and non-adeno-cancer were 59.8% and 40.2%. The average number of completed chemotherapy cycles was three. Measures of effectiveness included clinical benefit, significant clinical response (SCR) and adverse effects of GEM-Cis in the treatment of NSCLC at stages IIIb/IV.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>KPS increased from 79 +/- 9 at baseline to 86 +/- 10 after chemotherapy (P < 0.01). Lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS) score of pain, dyspnea and cough increased from 77 +/- 24, 74 +/- 22 and 63 +/- 19 to 92 +/- 15, 90 +/- 14 and 86 +/- 15, respectively (P < 0.01). The clinical benefit rate was 85.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.3% - 90.0%]. The SCR was 89.5% (95% CI 85.3% - 93.7%). Median survival time was 7.8 months (95% CI 7.1 months-9.1 months). Sixty-four patients (30.6%) experienced an adverse effect that was deemed clinically significant. Only one patient (0.5%) was hospitalized due to chemotherapy related adverse effects. Life-threatening toxicity was observed in two patients (1.0%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>First-line chemotherapy with GEM-Cis in the routine care of Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC is effective and safe.</p>