Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
International Journal of Stem Cells ; : 364-376, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-834321

RESUMO

Background and Objectives@#The HUC-HEART Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02323477) was a controlled, prospective, phase I/II, multicenter, single-blind, three-arm randomized study of intramyocardial delivery of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (HUC-MSCs) combined with coronary artery bypass-grafting (CABG) in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (CIC). The trial aimed to assess (i) the safety and the efficacy of cell transplantation during one-year follow-up, (ii) to compare the efficacy of HUC-MSCs with autologous bone-marrow- derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) in the same clinical settings. @*Methods@#and Results: Fifty-four patients who were randomized to receive HUC-MSCs (23×106) (n=26) or BM-MNCs (70×107) (n=12) in combination with CABG surgery. The control patients (n=16) received no cells/vehicles but CABG intervention. All patients were screened at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation. Forty-six (85%) patients completed 12 months follow-up. No short/mid-term adverse events were encountered. Decline in NT-proBNP (baseline∼ 6 months) in both cell-treated groups; an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (5.4%) and stroke volume (19.7%) were noted (baseline∼6 or 12 months) only in the HUC-MSC group. Decreases were also detected in necrotic myocardium as 2.3% in the control, 4.5% in BM-MNC, and 7.7% in the HUC-MSC groups. The 6-min walking test revealed an increase in the control (14.4%) and HUC-MSC (23.1%) groups. @*Conclusions@#Significant findings directly related to the intramyocardial delivery of HUC-MSCs justified their efficacy in CIC. Stricter patient selection criteria with precisely aligned cell dose and delivery intervals, rigorous follow-up by detailed diagnostic approaches would further help to clarify the responsiveness to the therapy.

2.
Korean Journal of Pediatrics ; : 450-455, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-786359

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lipid accumulation product (LAP) is associated with the presence and severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in adults.PURPOSE: Here we evaluated the ability of LAP to predict NAFLD in obese children.METHODS: Eighty obese children (38 girls; age 6–18 years) were included. Anthropometric measurements and biochemical values were obtained from the patients’ medical records. LAP was calculated as [waist circumference (WC) (cm) – 58]×triglycerides (mmol/L) in girls; [WC (cm) – 65]×triglycerides (mmol/L) in boys. The minLAP and adjLAP were described (3% and 50% of WC values, respectively) and the total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol index (TC/HDL-C) was calculated. NAFLD was observed on ultrasound, and patients were divided into 3 groups by steatosis grade (normal, grade 0; mild, grade 1; moderate-severe, grade 2–3). The area under the curve (AUC) and appropriate index cutoff points were calculated by receiver operator characteristic analysis.RESULTS: LAP was positively correlated with puberty stage (rho=0.409; P<0.001), fasting insulin (rho=0.507; P<0.001), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (rho=0.470; P<0.001), uric acid (rho=0.522; P<0.001), and TC/HDL-C (rho=0.494; P<0.001) and negatively correlated with HDL-C (rho=-3.833; P<0.001). LAP values could be used to diagnose hepatosteatosis (AUC=0.698; P=0.002). The LAP, adjLAP, and minLAP cutoff values were 42.7 (P=0.002), 40.05 (P=0.003), and 53.47 (P=0.08), respectively. For LAP, the differences between the normal and mild groups (P=0.035) and the normal and moderate-severe groups were statistically significant (P=0.037), whereas the difference between the mild and moderate-severe groups was not (P>0.005). There was a statistically significant difference between the normal and mild groups for adjLAP (P=0.043) but not between the other groups (P>0.005). There was no significant intergroup difference in minLAP (P>0.005).CONCLUSION: LAP is a powerful and easy tool to predict NAFLD in childhood. If LAP is ≥42.7, NAFLD should be suspected. This is the first study to assess LAP diagnostic accuracy for childhood obesity.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Colesterol , Jejum , Homeostase , Insulina , Resistência à Insulina , Produto da Acumulação Lipídica , Lipoproteínas , Prontuários Médicos , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Obesidade , Obesidade Infantil , Puberdade , Ultrassonografia , Ácido Úrico , Circunferência da Cintura
3.
Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2012; 32 (4): 391-396
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-132140

RESUMO

Even though the 50 g oral glucose challenge test [GCT] is the most commonly used screening modality for gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM], no consensus for the diagnostic approach is available to patients with a markedly elevated GCT result. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of markedly elevated GCT results and the impact of age using the oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] as gold standard. Retrospective study conducted in a women's hospital in Ankara, among patients who underwent GCT from January 2005 to December 2008. In this retrospective study, we included 626 pregnant women who underwent a 3-hour 100 g OGTT after a GCT result >/= 180 mg/dL among 29 842 women. We calculated positive predictive values [PPV] of each GCT category to diagnose GDM and both GDM and gestational impaired glucose tolerance [GIGT]. A GCT result of >/= 240 mg/dL provided 100% PPV for the diagnosis of GDM and a result of >230 mg/ dL provided 100% PPV for the diagnosis of GDM + gestational impaired glucose tolerance [GIGT], according to both, National Diabetes Data Group [NDDG] and Carpenter and Coustan [CC] criteria. A result of >/= 200 mg/dL provided 100% PPV for diagnosing GDM+GIGT in patients older than 35 years, according to the CC criteria. The GCT result of 200 mg/dL is an ideal cutoff value for the diagnosis of GDM + GIGT in patients >/= 35years, and OGTT can be omitted in these patients. In younger patients, the cutoff value should be chosen as 230 mg/dL

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA