RESUMO
Objective To research the reality of ELISA testing results with negative anti-HBc and positive antiHBe.Methods CMIA was carried out to retest antiHBc and antiHBe of 105 samples which were initially tested to have negative antiHBc and positive antiHBe.Results Among the 105 samples retested by CMIA,there were three different results,positive antiH-Bc with positive antiHBe,negative antiHBc with negative antiHBe and positive antiHBc with negative antiHBe,whose pro-portions were 72.38%,21.91% and 5.71% respectively;the fasle negative rates of antiHBc were 78.10% in total and 93.33%,96.15% and 47.37% in 3 subgroup with S/CO 1.00~ 1.20,1.20~2.00 and 2.00~ 3.00,respectively;the true positive rates of antiHBe were 72.38% in total and 42.86%,88.14% and 56.25% in 3 subgroups with S/CO 0.00~0.10, 0.10~0.80 and 0.80 ~ 1.00,respectively.Conclusion HBV-M results with negative antiHBc and positive antiHBe by ELISA could give suggestive value and not reflect true information about antiHBc and antiHBe with three alternatives which would be obtained through retesting by a second assay.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the characteristics of intestinal Microbiota in T2DM patients by two molecular fingerprint technologies,and investigate the correlation of intestinal microbiota and T2DM,and evaluate the application value of two fin-gerprint technologies.Methods Fecal samples of 8 healthy groups and 7 diabetes patients were collected.Then the total DNA of gut microbiota was extracted.Through the analysis of products by two molecular fingerprints of ERIC-PCR and DGGE-PCR,ecological characteristics of diversity and similarity of gut microbiota were obtained in healthy groups and dia-betes patients.Results Compared to healthy groups,the number of bands and Shannon-Wiener index of gut microbiota in di-abetes patients was decreased but no statistical significance.The similarity in patients group was declining(P <0.05),and the construction of gut microbiota was inclined to differ.Two fingerprint technologies of ERIC and DGGE could directly re-flect the diversity of gut microbiota and were the modern molecular biological techniques without depending on cultivation. ERIC was simple and convenient,had a better reflection of microbial diversity,but gel band cutting and regarded asa proper approach with higher diffraction efficiency and excellent repetition to studysequencing couldn’t be performed since there were more influencing factors on the experiment.DGGE could better reflect the ecological characteristics such as microbial diversity and similarity,and selecting bands,gel band cutting and sequencing could be done.Conclusion The composition and construction of gut microbiota in diabetes patients were changed,which suggests the occurrence of the disease had the correlation with gut microbiota.ERIC and DGGE is regarded as a proper approach with higher diffraction efficiency and ex-cellent repetition to study intestinal microbiota,but also gel band cutting,sequencing,bacteria identification can be performed by DGGE,both can be used in combination.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the diagnosis value of joint detection of microalbumin(mALB) ,α1-Microglolin(α1-M ) and N-acety-β-D-glucosaminidase(NAG) in the diabetes and hypertension patients with early injury of kidney .Methods Sample were col-lected from July 2013 to January 2014 ,including 63 diabetic cases(diabetic group) ,58 patients with hypertension(hypertension group) and 64 health controls(control group) ,then the levels of urinary mALB ,α1-M were detected by immunoturbidimetry ,urina-ry NAG activity was assessed by endpoint colorimetric assay .Results The levels of urinary mALB ,α1-M and NAG in diabetic group and hypertension group were higher than those in control group(P<0 .05) .The positive rates of three indices single detected were less than 50 .0% ,the positive rates of any two indices joint detected were more than 50 .0% ,the positive rate of three indices joint detected was more than 70 .0% .Conclusion The method of urinary mALB ,α1-M and NAG joint detected is sensitive and reli-able for diagnosing of the early injury of kidney .
RESUMO
Objective To analyze the conformance between the quantitative and qualitative tests of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs).Methods The chemiluminecence microparticle enzyme immunoassay(CMIA)was adopted to quantitatively detect anti-HBs and the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)was adopted to qualitatively detect anti-HBs.Results With the CMIA as the reference experiment,Se ,Sp ,J ,PV+ and PV-of anti-HBs detected by ELISA were 0.95,0.53,0.48,0.74 and 0.88 respec-tively,k=0.51;when the absorbance was 0.400 9,Se ,Sp ,J ,PV+ and PV-were 0.50,0.95,0.45,0.93 and 0.43 respectively;for the samples exceeding the absorbance range of 0.104 3 -0.400 9,Se ,Sp ,J ,PV+ and PV-qualitatively detected by ELISA were 0.90,0.91,0.81,0.93 and 0.88 respectively,k =0.81.Conclusion Determining cutoff value with the absorbance value 0.105 as the ELISA detection result has the good detection sensitivity(Se =0.95)and the better negative prediction value(PV-=0.88),the negative anti-HBs detected by ELISA may be considered that the anti-HBs concentration was less than 10 mIU/mL without the conservation value;when the sample absorbance ≥0.400 9,the anti-HBs concentration is ≥10 mIU/mL,which may be considered to have the conservation value;the gray area range of anti-HBs detected by ELISA is mainly the absorbance of 0.105-0.400 9,the true anti-HBs level should be quantitatively detected.