Correlations Between Values of Articulation Tests and Language Tests for Children With Articulation Disorder in Korea

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate correlations between values of articulation tests and language tests for children with articulation disorder in Korea. METHODS: Data of outpatients with chief complaint of an articulation problem were retrospectively collected. Patients who underwent Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonation (U-TAP) with Assessment of Phonology and Articulation for Children (APAC), Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale (PRES), or Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test (REVT) simultaneously were identified. Patients whose word-level percentages of correct consonants in U-TAP (UTAP_wC) were more than 2 standard deviations below the mean as diagnostic criteria for articulation disorder were selected. Those whose receptive language age (P_RLA), expressive language age (P_ELA), or combined language age (P_CLA) in PRES was delayed more than 24 months compared to their chronological age in months as diagnostic criteria for language disorder were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-three children aged 3–6 years were enrolled retrospectively. PRES and U-TAP showed significant correlations for most of value relationships. PRES and APAC showed significant correlations for all value relationships except for receptive language age. All values of REVT were significantly correlated with all values from U-TAP, but not with any value from APAC. Articulation tests U-TAP and APAC showed significant correlations between percentages of correct consonants. Language tests PRES and REVT showed significant correlations for all value relationships. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that articulation abilities and language abilities might be correlated in children with articulation disorder.

Effect of White Matter Hyperintensity on the Functional Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Patients after Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

The aim of the study is to investigate the association between cerebral white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and the functional improvement using the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) score during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. One hundred sixty participants were divided into 2 groups based on the severity of WMH according to Fazekas scale: Mild WMH group was defined as patients with Fazekas scale 0 and 1, and severe WMH group was defined as Fazekas scale 2 and 3. Functional status was assessed using the K-MBI score, and functional gains were calculated from the K-MBI score. The absolute functional gain in mild WMH group was significantly higher compared to severe WMH group (p < 0.05). In addition, patients in mild WMH had higher absolute functional efficiency, rehabilitation effectiveness, and relative functional efficiency. In the generalized linear model analyses, there was an association between functional outcomes and severity of WMH. In this study, the severity and extent of WMH are significantly correlated with poor functional improvement in patients with ischemic stroke. The WMH could be considered as one of many factors that can influence functional recovery during rehabilitation of stroke.