Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 38(1): 162-165, Jan.-Feb. 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423091

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The incidence of diagnosed massive pulmonary embolism presenting to the Emergency Department is between 3% and 4.5% and it is associated with high mortality if not intervened timely. Cardiopulmonary arrest in this subset of patients carries a very poor prognosis, and various treating pathways have been applied with modest rate of success. Systemic thrombolysis is an established first line of treatment, but surgeons are often involved in the decision-making because of the improving surgical pulmonary embolectomy outcomes.

2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 37(6): 921-931, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1407309

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The management of Type A aortic dissection has evolved over a period of a decade or so, and contemporary reports are suggesting a paradigm shift from a conservative approach to complete excision of the diseased aorta including root and distal arch. Improved cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion techniques, better understanding of the cerebral perfusion, and wide-ranging obtainability of prosthetic conduits gave surgical teams numerous choices. With improving outcomes and maturing surgical techniques, surgeons are performing extensive resections of the diseased aorta, but there is no standard protocol as far as the extent of the proximal and distal diseased aortic tissue resection is concerned. Aortic root replacement is associated with good early- and long-term outcomes and proffered solution in young and stable patients, for that reason many busy centres are endorsing total arch replacement in complex distal aortic dissections. This systemic review is discussing contemporary literature and associated pros and cons during surgical decision-making for these high-risk cases.

3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 2022 Mar; 25(1): 11-18
Artigo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-219189

RESUMO

Background:Fluid resuscitation during Off-Pump Coronary Surgery (OPCABG) is still not protocolized and depends on multiple variables. We are exploring in this study whether a restrictive or euvolemic approach has any impact on short term surgical outcomes following OPCABG. Methods: It is a retrospective study of 300 patients analyzed based on the intraoperative fluid requirement with 150 patients in each group (Group I: Fluid <2 Litres, Group II: Fluid >2 Litres). Results: Multivariable analysis showed echocardiography variables such as E/e ratio, LA volume index, and atrial fibrillation (AF). LA volume index is related to the higher fluid requirement. Group II had significantly higher ventilation time (P < 0.05), drain output (P = 0.05), drain removal time (<0.05), inotropic requirement, and diuretic use. Conclusion: The requirement of the intraoperative fluid was associated with various factors including diastolic dysfunction (left atrial volume index, left ventricle mass index, E/e ratio) and preoperative dual antiplatelet use. Group II patients had longer ventilation time, diuretics use, high drain output, and required drains for a longer period of time. Although there was no statistical difference among two groups as far as postoperative AF concerned, a reversal of AF to sinus rhythm was delayed in group II patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA