Relatively anterior lens position in primary angle-closure glaucoma eyes with long axial length

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive status and ocular biometric parameters in primary angle?closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes with different axial lengths (ALs). Methods: In total, 742 Chinese PACG subjects with complete ophthalmic examinations were enrolled. The refractive status was categorized as myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] ??0.5 D), emmetropia (?0.5 D < SE < +0.5 D), and hyperopia (SE ?+0.5 D), whereas the AL was divided into short (AL <22.5 mm), regular (22.5 ? AL <23.5 mm), and long (AL ?23.5 mm). The refractive status and ocular biometric parameters were compared among different AL groups. Results: The mean AL of the PACG eyes was 22.53 ± 0.84 mm (range: 19.68–25.57 mm). The refractive status was significantly different among different AL groups (P < 0.001). Also, 92.6% of hyperopic PACG eyes showed AL <23.5 mm, and 19.0% of myopic PACG eyes showed AL ?23.5 mm. The SE showed significant differences among different AL groups only in the hyperopic subjects (P = 0.012). The AL was significantly longer in myopic eyes (P < 0.001). The PACG eyes with longer AL exhibited lower keratometry, longer central anterior chamber depth and corneal diameter, and lens position and relative lens position closer to the anterior (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Axial hyperopia was common in PACG eyes, and axial myopia was not uncommon. Relatively anterior lens position could explain the occurrence of PACG in the eyes with long AL.

Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopic astigmatism

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of astigmatic correction by single?step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) and femtosecond?assisted laser in?situ keratomileusis (Femto?LASIK) surgeries. Methods: A total of 218 subjects received TransPRK or Femto?LASIK surgery for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism (?2.25 to ?0.25 D). Refraction errors and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were examined before and at 3 months after surgery. Astigmatism changes were assessed by vector analysis. Results: Preoperative parameters of the TransPRK group were similar to the Femto?LASIK group. UDVA and CDVA at 3 months were similar between both groups. Manifest refraction (MR) spherical equivalent in the TransPRK group (0 ± 0.20 D) was slightly lower compared with the Femto?LASIK group at 3 months (0.11 ± 0.25 D, P = 0.001). MR cylinder was ?0.06 ± 0.19 D in the TransPRK group and ?0.02 ± 0.15 D in the Femto?LASIK group at 3 months (P = 0.135). The index of success (IS) was 0.15 ± 0.36 in the TransPRK group and 0.06 ± 0.17 in the Femto?LASIK group (P = 0.125). The correction index (CI) was 1.03 ± 0.19 in the TransPRK group and 1.01 ± 0.11 in the Femto?LASIK group (P = 0.815). Conclusion: For low to moderate myopic astigmatism, TransPRK provided a comparable astigmatic treatment effect as Femto?LASIK. Myopic astigmatism was both slightly overcorrected after TransPRK and Femto?LASIK surgeries