RESUMO
Background: A Phase IV, single?arm study was conducted to assess the safety of osimertinib in Indian patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation?positive stage IV non?small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Enrolled patients received 80 mg osimertinib for six cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. Primary safety variables included treatment?emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation/interruption/change (D/I/C) of drug dose, and AEs of special interest (AESIs). AEs were summarized by the percentage of patients experiencing at least one occurrence of each event. Results: Of the 60 enrolled patients (median age 58 [range: 34�] years; 51.7% women) at eight sites, nine patients were discontinued prematurely due to disease progression (n = 7) and death (n = 2); median (range) duration of treatment was 126 (1�4) days. Median age of patients was 58 (34�) years; 51.7% (n = 31) were women; 86.7% (n = 52) were nonsmokers; and most of them (98.3%) had adenocarcinoma. About 75% (n = 45) of patients experienced any of the TEAEs, with the most frequent being fatigue and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increase (n = 6, 10% each). TEAEs in 11 (18.3%) patients were judged as study treatment related, with CPK increase being the most common (n = 4, 6.7%). TEAEs led to D/I/C of drug dose in eight (13.3%) patients, with one being study treatment related. Nine (15%) patients had AESIs of dyspnea (n = 6), chest pain (n = 2), and cardiorespiratory arrest (n = 1); two of them had a fatal outcome. One AESI (mild dyspnea) was considered study drug related. TEAEs of grade ?3 were reported in seven (11.7%) patients, including dyspnea in two (3.3%), followed by diarrhea, mucosal inflammation, cardiorespiratory arrest, and others (n = 1,1.7% each). None of the SAEs and fatal events were considered as study treatment related. Seven (11.7%) patients had abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG; not clinically significant) at the end of the study. Conclusion: Our study confirms the favorable safety profile of osimertinib without any new safety concerns in Indian patients with EGFR T790M mutation?positive stage IV NSCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03853551 CTRI registration no. CTRI/2018/10/015941
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BCa) is the ninth most common cancer accounting for 3.9% of all cancer cases as per the Indian Cancer Registry data. There is a scarcity of data on urinary Bca from India. AIM: The aim of this study was to know demographic background, stage distribution, utilization of various treatment modalities, and oncological outcome in Indian patients presenting with bladder cancer to a tertiary care cancer center in Mumbai. METHODOLOGY: We performed a retrospective audit of all patients registered as urinary BCa in our hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013. Electronic medical records of these patients were checked for most of the information gathered. RESULTS: Median age of patients at presentation was 59 years with a range of 18–88 years. There were 84% male and 16% female patients. Forty seven percent of patients had nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), 36% had muscle invasive bladder cancer and locally advanced disease, and 17% had metastatic disease. Eight patients were treated with trimodality bladder preservation protocol. Recurrence was seen in 38 (22.6%) patients with NMIBC. Out of them. 44.7% and 55.3% were in low- and high-grade tumors, respectively. Overall survival and disease-free survival estimated for 3 years were 63% and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bladder cancer has a varied spectrum of presentation. Bladder cancer patients presenting to our hospital generally have a higher stage and grade of disease compared with that in the west.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of weekly chemotherapy as part of induction chemotherapy, in locally advanced head and neck cancer for patients, who are unfit for upfront radical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective analysis of on‑use weekly chemotherapy as Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer, who are technically unresectable are unfit for upfront radical treatment. Induction chemotherapy given was a 2 drug combination of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and carboplatin AUC 2. The decision to give weekly induction chemotherapy was given on the basis of presence of 2 more following features: Poor performance status (ECOG PS 2‑3), presence of uncontrolled co morbidities, BMI below 18.5 kg/m2 and age more than 60 years. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS version 16.0) was used for analysis. The response rates, toxicity (accordance with CTCAE vs. 4.02), completion rate (Cp) of radical intent treatment post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), progression‑free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are reported. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were considered for such therapy. Fourteen out of fifteen patients completed NACT. The median numbers of planned weekly cycles were 6 (3-8). Response (CR + PR) was seen in 10 patients. Overall grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 6 patients. No toxicity related mortality was noted. The calculated completion rate (Cp) of radical intent treatment post NACT was 46.7%. The median PFS and OS were 10.36 months (95% CI 6.73-14.00 months) and 16.53 months (95% CI 4.22-28.84). CONCLUSION: Use of induction chemotherapy with weekly regimen is safe and effective selected cohort of patients with locally advanced disease who are unfit for upfront radical treatment.