Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Dolor ; 20(56): 12-16, dic. 2011. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-682518

RESUMO

El presente estudio descriptivo da cuenta de resultados en aplicación de intervencionismo para alivio del dolor musculoesquelético en enfermos con diagnóstico de cáncer terminal, pero que se mantienen activos, e ingresados a Unidad de Alivio del Dolor y Cuidados Paliativos del Hospital del Salvador en Santiago de Chile, entre los meses de julio del 2010 a marzo del 2011. Los principales diagnósticos causantes de dolor musculoesquelético fueron síndrome miofascial, artrosis y ambos diagnósticos combinados. Las técnicas usadas fueron infiltración de punto gatillo, infiltración intra-articular, o ambas. Los resultados mostraron disminución estadísticamente significativa en la intensidad del dolor en forma global en escala numérica, así como al analizar según tipo de intervención por separado. La media de duración del efecto fue de un mes en el caso de infiltración de puntos gatillo. Este tiempo podría constituir una ventana analgésica en pacientes con sobrevida limitada y controlaría el alza de analgésicos. Cuando el DME está presente, el uso de terapia intervencionista para DME podría ser una herramienta útil en Cuidados Paliativos, pero se requieren mayores estudios con mejor diseño estadístico para poder obtener conclusiones con mayor nivel de seguridad.


This descriptive study gives an account of results of interventionism implementation to the relief of musculoskeletal pain in patients that were diagnosed with terminal cancer; but have retained activity level, which are given they state of health at the Unit Pain Relief And Palliative Care at Hospital del Salvador in Santiago, Chile between the months of July 2010 to March 2011. The main causes of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses were Myofascial pain syndrome, arthritis and both combined conditions. The techniques used were trigger point infiltration, intra-articular joint infiltration or both together. The results showed statistical significant decrease in pain intensity on a numerical scale global, as well as the analysis by the type of separately intervention. The mean duration of effect was about a month in the case of infiltration of trigger points, this time window could be a survival analgesic in patients with limited and control the rise of analgesics. When the DME is present, the use of interventional therapy for DMA could be useful tool in palliative care, but require larger studies with better statistical design in order to draw conclusions with greater security.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Dor Musculoesquelética/complicações , Dor Musculoesquelética/terapia , Neoplasias/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos , Clínicas de Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Neoplasias/terapia , Osteoartrite/complicações , Osteoartrite/terapia , Medição da Dor , Síndromes da Dor Miofascial/complicações , Síndromes da Dor Miofascial/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 127(11): 1339-44, nov. 1999. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-257992

RESUMO

Background: in 1992, a consensus conference defined the terms systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. Since then, numerous reports have validated the prognostic usefulness of these operative definitions. Aim: to evaluate if sepsis severity criteria, as defined by the Consensus Conference, can be applied to noninfectious SIRS. Patients and methods: five hundred eighteen patients admitted to 5 intensive care units (ICU) from 4 hospitals were prospectively evaluated during a 3 months period. Patients that met at least one severity criteria were included. SIRS etiology, organ dysfunction and evolution were recorded in each patient. Results: One hundred two patients were included: 79 with sepsis (group I) and 23 with noninfectious SIRS (group II). ICU and hospital mortality were comparable (43 and 48 percent in sepsis compared to 43 and 51 percent in non infectious SIRS). The most common sources of sepsis were pneumonia and peritonitis. Group II patients had a wide variety of diseases. ICU stay, APACHE score and number of organs with dysfunction were not different among groups. Only the incidence of renal dysfunction was higher in the septic group. Conclusions: The Consensus sepsis severity criteria can be applied to noninfectious SIRS, defining a population subset with similar high mortality and organ dysfunction incidence, although with greatly heterogeneous etiologies


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sepse/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Peritonite/complicações , Sepse/etiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/patogenicidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Evolução Clínica , Pneumonia/complicações , Prognóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA