Clinical profile and outcome of children with parapneumonic effusion

@#Parapneumonic effusions frequently occur as complications of pneumonia. Data from developing countries is limited. The purpose of this paper is to review the epidemiological and clinical profile of parapneumonic effusions among children admitted in a tertiary government hospital. Methodology: Medical records of 72 children diagnosed with parapneumonic effusions from 2005-to-2009 were obtained. Demography, clinical presentations, diagnostics, treatment modalities, outcomes, etiology and antibiotic susceptibilities were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Comparison of purulent effusion and empyema was done using parametric or non-parametric statistics, accordingly. Results: There were 106 children discharged with a diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion. Of the 96 medical records available, 72 patients fulfilled the criteria for parapneumonic effusions. Only 53 patients submitted pleural fluid for analysis: 29 cases were empyema, while 24 cases were purulent effusion; mean age was 9.66 years. Fever (90.28%), cough (69.44%), and dyspnea (66.67%) were the most common clinical presentations. Forty-four patients underwent thoracentesis while 37 children had closed-tube thoracostomy. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) was the most commonly isolated organism from the pleural fluid cultures (9.26%) and blood cultures (6.25%). Patients with purulent effusion were treated with a combination of antibiotics and anti-TB meds (75%).Majority of patients with empyema were treated with antibiotics alone (79.31%). Earlier improvement and shorter hospital stay were observed among patients with purulent effusion. Conclusion: Parapneumonic effusions occurred in 6.80% of hospitalized children with pneumonia; 54.72% of which were empyema and 45.28% were purulent effusion. MRSA was the most commonly isolated organism. Chest imaging, pleural fluid analysis and cultures, and blood cultures were important diagnostic procedures. The mainstays of treatment were medical, surgical or both, depending on the severity of effusion. Prompt diagnosis and management could account for favorable clinical outcomes.

A paired comparison of tuberculin skin test results in children with clinical manifestations of tuberculosis using 2 TU and 5 TU tuberculins

Rationale: A paired comparison of reactivity to purified protein derivative 2 TU PPD RT-23 and 5 TU PPD-S in children with clinical manifestations of tuberculosis was done to assess if 2 TU PPD RT-23 can be used instead of 5 TU PPD-S in routine Mantoux testing in the country. Objective: To determine the correlation of skin test reactivity to 2 TU PPD RT-23 and 5 TU PPD-S. Study Design: Cross Sectional Study. Methods: Two simultaneous skin tests using 2 TU PPD RT-23 and 5 TU PPD-S were performed. Each dose was randomly assigned in a blinded manner to the right or left forearm and read after 72 hours. Correlation between the size of induration obtained with 2 TU PPD RT-23 and with 5 TU PPD-S was done, as well as, correlation between tuberculin reactivity and age, gender, nutritional status, presence of BCG vaccination, exposure, and clinical manifestations. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Sixty five patients were included in the study. The overall mean difference in paired reaction sizes for the two doses was-1.02 + 2.8 mm (range of -11 to 3 mm). Using the present guidelines in the country to determine a positive tuberculin skin test, 27 (41.5 %) patients were positive when tested with 2 TU PPD RT-23 and 33 (50.8 %) patients were positive when tested with 5 TU PPD. The mean PPD size with 2 TU was 4.7 mm + 6.1 mm compared to 5.8 mm + 6.1 mm with 5 TU. PPD skin test reactivity with the two reagents was highly correlated (intraclass correlation 0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.94). There was no significant association between age, gender, nutritional status, presence of BCG vaccination, TB exposure, and clinical manifestations to tuberculin reactivity. Conclusion: Tuberculin skin test reactivity among children, who were with clinical manifestations of tuberculosis and tested with 2 TU PPD RT-23 and 5 TU PPD-S, were found to be comparable. Age, gender, nutritional status, presence of BCG vaccination, TB exposure, and clinical manifestations were not factors influencing the size of the PPD reaction. 2 TU PPD RT-23 can be used instead of 5 TU PPD-S in routine Mantoux testing.

The clinical and epidemiologic profile of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection among pediatric patients admitted at the Philippine General Hospital

Background: Several studies have reported increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection among patients with no predisposing factors. This paper aims to determine the clinical and epidemiologic profile of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infection among children admitted at UP-PGH. Methodology: A retrospective review of the medical records of patients 0-to-18 years old with S. aureus isolate admitted at University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital (UP PGH) from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008 was conducted. S. aureus isolates were classified as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), CA-MRSA or healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). Risk factors for MRSA acquisition were identified. Demographic data, site of infection, outcome, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns were compared. Results: S. aureus was isolated in 382 children. Medical records of 219 (57.33%) patients were available for review. Of the 219 patients, 40.64% had MSSA, 15.07% had CA-MRSA, and 44.3% had HA-MRSA isolates. The prevalence of CA-MRSA is seven per 1000 admissions. There was no statistical difference between the age, sex, outcome and the site of infection among the three groups. The most common source of isolates was exudates, followed by blood. There were statistically significant differences in the resistance patterns of S. aureus isolates, with MSSA and CA-MRSA having lower resistance rates (40%) and non-beta lactam antibiotics such as tetracycline, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin and vancomycin. Conclusion: This study showed that MRSA infection is no longer limited to patients with predisposing factors. The type of S. aureus infection cannot be predicted based on clinical and demographic profile of patients. Based on the susceptibility patterns in this study, CA-MRSA may be treated with tetracycline, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin and vancomycin.

The effect on various treatment methods on the disinfection of artificially contaminated water

Since waterborne diseases are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the Philippine setting, it is evident that the quality of water supplies cannot always be assured, and remedial measures are required to provide consumers with safe drinking water. Boiling is a proven household disinfection method, but doubt regarding its efficacy has led to a search for alternatives. This study was thus performed to compare the efficacy of various methods of water treatment, and to perform a cost analysis for each method Sterile water was seeded with E. Coli ATCC 25922 to a concentration of 10 exponent 5 cfu/ml. Equal amounts were then disinfected by:(1) boiling for 10 minutes; (2) passage through an ultraviolet (UV) light water treatment device (UV Waterworks TM); (3) reverse osmosis (RO). Three replicates were done for each procedure, and for each replicate five aliquots were obtained for (1) immediate testing: (2) testing after 24 hours in room temperature; (3) testing after 24 hours at a temperature of 2-8 degrees C; (4) testing after 48 hours in room temperature; and (5) testing after 48 hours at a temperature of 2-8 degrees C, Samples were analyzed using the spread-plate method on MacConkeys agar. For all samples taken, no growth was seen after 24 hours of incubation Taking into account the cost of consumables for each method, UV disinfection has the advantage of being 200 times less expensive than boiling, which in turn is less costly by 50 percent compared to RO. The increased cost of RO is due to large amount of water discarded during processing. An advantage offered by methods such as RO and UV disinfection is its time-saving aspect. However, households without access to UV or RO units should consider boiling a cost-effective option, so long as manpower and fuel resources are available. (Author)