Immunohistochemical analysis of thyroid follicular neoplasms and BRAF mutation correlation.

BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis of benign and malign thyroid tumors is very important for the clinical management of patients. The distinction of thyroid papillary carcinoma follicular variant and follicular adenoma can be difficult. AIM: To investigate the alternative methods like immunohistochemistry and exon 15 in the BRAF gene 1799 T/A mutation analyses for distinguishing thyroid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied immunohistochemical markers; CK19, HMWCK, Galectin‑3, HBME‑1 and Fibronectin and mutant allelespecific PCR amplification technique was used to determine 1799 T/A mutation within the BRAF gene. Formalin‑fixed parafin embedded tissues from 45 surgically total resected thyroids, included 26 thyroid papillary carcinoma follicular variant (FV‑TPC), 8 Follicular Adenoma (FA), 6 Minimal invasive follicular carcinoma (MIFC) and 5 Follicular Carcinoma (FC). STATISTICAL ANALYSES USED: Pearson Chi‑Square and Kruskal Wallis tests were performed. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between FV‑TPC and HMWCK, CK 19, HBME1, Galectin 3, fibronectin (P < 0.05), but there was no correlation with FV‑TPC and BRAF gene mutation (P > 0.05). HBME‑1 and CK 19 stained strong and diffuse positive in FV‑TPCs but weak and focal in FAs. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that morphologic features combined with immunohistochemical panel of HMWCK, CK19, HBME‑1, Galectin‑3 and fibronectin can help to distinguish benign and malign thyroid neoplasms and FV‑TPC from follicular adenomas. BRAF gene 1799 T/A mutation has been non‑specific but its detection can be a useful tool combined with immunohistochemistry for diagnosing FV‑TPC.

Immunohistochemical detection of p53 and MDM2 expressions in liposarcoma with World health organization classification.

BACKGROUND: Liposarcomas are among the most common soft tissue sarcomas in adulthood. AIM: The purpose of the study is to perform a histopathologic typing according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification of cases diagnosed with liposarcoma and to examine the difference of p53 and MDM2 expressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The haematoxylin-eosin stained sections of 48 subjects enrolled in the study have been evaluated on the basis of the WHO classification for liposarcoma and sections stained using p53 and MDM2. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-Square test was applied. RESULTS: 20 subjects were diagnosed with well-differentiated liposarcoma (WLS), 16 myxoid liposarcoma (ML), 7 pleomorphic liposarcoma (PL), and 5 de-differentiated liposarcoma (DLS). The number of cases stained positive with MDM2 and p53 were positive correlated in all subjects (P = 0.02). p53 and MDM2 positivity increased in high grade tumors (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: p53 and MDM2 immuno-reactivity was found to be potentially useful in liposarcoma diagnosis but a definitive implication would be rather unhealthy due to the small number of cases in our study.