Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(4): 470-476, July-Aug. 2007. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-465782

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is well tolerated by patients but the lack of an effective marker to predict pain prevents us from determining pre-procedurally which patient group needs local anesthesia for biopsy and probe pain. Thus in this study, we investigated predictor factors for prostate biopsy and probe insertion pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 patients who were undergoing prostate biopsy without anesthesia were included in the study retrospectively. Pain had been assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). Digital rectal examination (DRE) pain was analyzed for biopsy and probe insertion pain. RESULTS: DRE pain was related to both probe pain and biopsy pain. CONCLUSION: Although level of pain during DRE determines patients in need of local anesthesia, since the number of patients with moderate-severe pain is rather big, it seems efficient in determining the patients in need of additional anesthesia due to probe pain.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anestesia Local/métodos , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Exame Retal Digital/efeitos adversos , Dor/prevenção & controle , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Exame Retal Digital/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Medição da Dor , Dor/etiologia , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA