RESUMO
@#Abstract: Objective The study aims to investigate the diagnosis quality and accuracy of syphilis cases reported by medical facilities in Inner Mongolia, understand possible problems and influencing factors in reporting and diagnosis, providing evidence for the better formulation of syphilis control and prevention. Methods Cross-sectional survey was conducted with 2 counties sampled randomly from 12 municipals of Inner Mongolia, different medical facilities were covered. Syphilis cases reported from July 2019 to June 2020 in medical institutions of different categories were sampled and checked. The quality and accuracy of syphilis case reporting were evaluated according to the identifiers in "Syphilis Diagnosis (WS 273-2018)" and "National STD Case Reporting Quality Management Scheme (2018)". In addition, the basic information of medical institutions and the implementation of syphilis detection in laboratories were investigated, and the physicians who reported the case first were interviewed to understand their mastery of syphilis diagnosis and reporting, thus analyzing the major factors influencing the accuracy of reports. Results The reporting rate of syphilis in medical institutions in Inner Mongolia was 99.04% (311/314), the missing-report rate was 0.96% (3/314), the timely reporting rate was 98.05% (1 659/1 692), the completeness rate was 99.64% (1 686/1 692), the correct rate was 99.35% (1 681/1 692), the accuracy rate of internet-based input was 84.63% (1 432/1 692). There were statistical differences in the quality (χ2=13.95, P<0.05; χ2=11.40, P<0.05) and accuracy （χ2=30.06, P<0.05; χ2=44.93, P<0.05) of reports among different municipals and different types of medical facilities. The accuracy rate of syphilis reporting by medical institutions was 86.17% (1 458/1 692), the correct rate for classifying diagnosis was 87.06% (1 473/1 692), and the accuracy rate of staging was 90.25% (1 527/1 692). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that whether the first-clinic physician attended training in the past three years [OR=6.26, 95%CI: (2.12-18.46)] and whether they grasped the key points of syphilis classification standard [OR=2.79, 95%CI: (1.21-6.46)] influenced report accuracy. Conclusions The quality of reports in Inner Mongolia medical institutions is generally high, but the accuracy rate of reporting and correctness of network input have not yet reached the target requirement of 95%. There is still room for improvement in reporting and diagnostic capabilities. It is suggested to further strengthen the training frequency and coverage for physicians on syphilis diagnosis standard.