Causes of stress and their change with repeated sessions as perceived by undergraduate medical students during high-fidelity trauma simulation.

Background. It is known that simulation training is associated with stress for the trainees, at all levels of trainee experience. We explored the factors which were perceived by the trainees to cause them the maximum stress related to their simulation experience and their temporal changes over three simulation sessions. Methods. Ninety-seven final year medical students were administered a Likert-type questionnaire on perceived stressors after trauma simulation training. These stressors were classified as intrapsychic (relating to internal feelings); interpersonal (relating to interaction with others) and interactive (related to interaction with the simulated patient). Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Results. Death of the simulated patient scored highest of all stressors. When the median scores for intrapsychic, interpersonal or interactive items were plotted session-wise, three distinct types of graphs were obtained. Eight of 13 items had a decrease in perceived stress scores from the first to the second session. Only ‘death of the simulated patient’ showed a significant increase in the score from the second to the third session. Conclusion. Undergraduate medical trainees experienced stress due to various factors during their first simulation session, which reduced with repeated sessions. However, perceived stress related to simulated death of a patient continued to remain high even after two repetitions. We suggest that simulation training programmes for undergraduate medical students should have at least one repeat session to reduce the stress and that facilitators should consider keeping the simulated patient alive throughout the training sessions.

Immunoblot analysis of sera in uncomplicated typhoid fever & with typhoid ileal perforation.

Background & objectives: Ileal perforation is a serious complication of typhoid fever. The exact reasons for the development of perforation in only a few of those infected with Salmonella Typhi is unknown, and it is likely that immunological factors are involved. Therefore we undertook this study to compare the antibody profile in patients with uncomplicated typhoid fever with those having ileal perforation by immunoblotting. Methods: Two groups of patients were included in the study. Group II comprised patients with uncomplicated typhoid fever (n=47), and group I with typhoid ileal perforation (n=33). The flagellar (H), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and outer membrane protein (OMP) antigens of Salmonella Typhi were extracted and used to test patient sera for antibodies by immunoblotting Results: Immunoblotting using S. Typhi antigens enabled the detection of S. Typhi antibodies in the two groups of patients. A significant difference was seen in the response of these two groups of patients with respect to antibodies to flagella, lipopolysaccharide and outer membrane proteins. Antibodies to flagella were more pronounced among patients with uncomplicated typhoid fever, while anti-OMP antibodies were significantly associated with typhoid ileal perforation. Interpretation & conclusions: A comparison of antibodies in patients with uncomplicated typhoid fever and with ileal perforation revealed the differences in the antibody profiles of the two groups. Our study suggests that the difference in antibody response may in some way play a role in the pathogenesis of typhoid ileal perforation which can also potentially be exploited to develop suitable diagnostic tests.