Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 2015 Jul; 18(3): 329-334
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-162332

RESUMO

Aims: To determine if percutaneous tracheostomy is safe in critically ill patients treated with anticoagulant therapies. Settings and Design: Single‑center retrospective study including all the patients who underwent percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) placement over a 1-year period in a 14‑bed, cardiothoracic and vascular Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: Patients demographics and characteristics, anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies, coagulation profile, performed technique and use of bronchoscopic guidance were retrieved. Results: Thirty‑six patients (2.7% of the overall ICU population) underwent PDT over the study period. Twenty‑six (72%) patients were on anticoagulation therapy, 1 patient was on antiplatelet therapy and 2 further patients received prophylactic doses of low molecular weight heparin. Only 4 patients had normal coagulation profile and were not receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies. Overall, bleeding of any severity complicated 19% of PDT. No procedure‑related deaths occurred. Conclusions: PDT was proved to be safe even in critically ill‑patients treated with anticoagulant therapies. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Traqueostomia/métodos
2.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 2012 Oct; 15(4): 274-277
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-143918

RESUMO

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established tool in the management of cardiac dysfunction in cardiac surgery. The best timing for IABP weaning is unknown and varies greatly among cardiac centers. The authors investigated the differences in IABP management among 66 cardiac surgery centers performing 40,675 cardiac surgery procedures in the 12-month study period. The centers were contacted through email, telephone, or in person interview. IABP management was very heterogeneous in this survey: In 43% centers it was routinely removed on the first postoperative day, and in 34% on the second postoperative day. In 50% centers, it was routinely removed after extubation of the patients whereas in 15% centers it was removed while the patients were sedated and mechanically ventilated. In 66% centers, patients were routinely receiving pharmacological inotropic support at the time of removal of IABP. The practice of decreasing IABP support was also heterogeneous: 57% centers weaned by reducing the ratio of beat assistance whereas 34% centers weaned by reducing balloon volume. We conclude that the management of IABP is heterogeneous and there is a need for large prospective studies on the management of IABP in cardiac surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/métodos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA