RESUMO
Background and Objective: Salmonella is one of the most important zoonotic pathogens responsible for food-borne infections all over the world. Poultry products are widely acknowledged to be a significant reservoir for Salmonella. This study was done to evaluate the antibiotic resistant of Salmonella enterica producer of beta lactamase spectrum in poultry
Methods: In this descriptive - laboratort study 70 Salmonella enterica serotypes were collected from poultry. All Salmonella isolates were tested to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI]. Twenty-nine antibiotics were used in this study. Klebsiella pneumoniae; ATCC 700603 was used as quality control strains. The isolates were determined to be ESBL-producing Salmonella by the conventional double-disk synergy and genotypic method
Results: Among 70 salmonella isolates, the most prevalent serotypes were S.typhimurium and S.enteritidis. All serotypes were susceptible to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, oflaxacin, imipenem, enrofloxacin. The common resistance was observed to cephalexin [96%], cefazolin [96%] and cephalotin [65%]. Among the 70 Salmonella isolates studied, multi-drug resistance was observed in 59 [84%] isolates. Forty-seven [67%] isolates were found to be ESBL-producing isolates. PCR assay of all isolates showed that 17 isolates [33.3%] carried bala CMY2 gene
Conclusion: This study showed that antibiotic resistance to Salmonella enterica serotypes is due to beta lactamase enzyme in this strain is considerably increased in poultry
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by leptospires, in which transmission occurs through contact with contaminated biological fluids from infected animals. Rodents can act as a source of infection for humans and animals. The disease has a global distribution, mainly in humid, tropical and sub-tropical regions. The aim of this study was to compare culture assays, the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and nested PCR (n-PCR), for the diagnosis of leptospirosis in rodents in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran. METHODS: One hundred fifty-one rodents were trapped alive at 10 locations, and their urine and kidney samples were collected and used for the isolation of live Leptospira. The infecting serovars were identified and the antibody titres were measured by MAT, using a panel of 20 strains of live Leptospira species as antigens. The presence of leptospiral DNA was evaluated in urine and kidney samples using PCR and n-PCR. RESULTS: No live leptospires were isolated from the kidney and urine samples of the rodents. Different detection rates of leptospirosis were observed with MAT (21.2%), PCR (11.3%), and n-PCR (3.3%). The dominant strain was Leptospira serjoehardjo (34.4%, p=0.28), although other serotypes were also found. The prevalence of positive leptospirosis tests in rodents was 15.9, 2.6, and 2.6% among Rattus norvegicus, R. rattus, and Apodemus sylvaticus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Leptospirosis was prevalent in rodents in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran. MAT was able to detect leptospires more frequently than culture or PCR. The kidney was a more suitable site for identifying leptospiral DNA by n-PCR than urine. Culture was not found to be an appropriate technique for clinical diagnosis.