Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy with subsequent iliac vein stent implantation accomplished by single-procedure for acute deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity: preliminary results in 12 cases / 介入放射学杂志

Objective To evaluate the feasibility,safety and effectiveness of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and iliac vein stent implantation which are accomplished by single-procedure in treating acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity.Methods During the period from December 2014 to January 2016,a total of 12 patients with acute DVT of lower extremity,including 3 males and 9 females with a mean age of (50.42±16.21) years old,were admitted to authors' hospital to receive treatment.Clinically,all patients presented with left leg swelling and pain.Central type of DVT was seen in 3 patients and mixed type of DVT was found in 9 patients.Preoperative placement of inferior vena cava filter was employed in all patients,which was retrieved after the treatment.PMT by using Angio Jet thrombus removal catheter,balloon angioplasty,and iliac vein stent implantation were successively carried out during the same procedure.When residual thrombus was identified on checkup angiography the catheter sheath would be reserved,and the thrombolytic therapy would be adopted.The patients were followed up at outpatient clinic at one,3,6 and 12 months after the treatment,and reexamination of color ultrasound and/or lower limb venography was used to assess the blood flow in the deep veins and in the stents.Results The combination of several therapies was accomplished in a single procedure,the technical success rate was 100％.The used time for the operation was 60-110 minutes,with a mean of (96.25±14.32) minutes.The used time for thrombus aspiration was 51-280 seconds,with a mean of (199.92±74.89) seconds.Thrombus clearance rate of grade Ⅲ was obtained in 10 patients,and thrombus clearance rate of grade Ⅱ was seen in 2 patients;the clinical symptoms were improved in all patients.Except some patients complained of different degrees of pain during the performance of balloon dilatation of left common iliac vein,no serious complications such as pulmonary embolism,severe hemorrhage,etc.occurred.The patients were followed up for (5.58±2.75) months;color ultrasound and/or lower limb venography performed in 11 patients showed that the blood flow in deep veins and iliac vein stents was unobstructed,and relapse of DVT was observed in one patient with cerebral astrocytoma.Conclusion For the treatment of DVT of lower extremity,PMT combined with iliac vein stent implantation that is accomplished by single-procedure is safe and feasible,its preliminary clinical results are satisfactory.

Stenting of iliac vein obstruction following catheter-directed thrombolysis in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremity has good effect, but whether iliac vein stent placement after thrombolytic therapy is still controversial. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of stent placement in the iliac vein following CDT in lower extremity DVT.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. After receiving CDT, the major branch of the distal iliac vein was completely patent in 155 patients with lower extremity DVT, and 74 of these patients with iliac vein residual stenosis of >50% were randomly divided into a control group (n = 29) and a test group (n = 45). In the test group, stents were implanted in the iliac vein, whereas no stents were implanted in the control group. We evaluated the clinical indicators, including patency of the deep vein, C in CEAP classification, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ) Score.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All patients had postoperative follow-up visits for a period of 6-24 months. Venography or color ultrasound was conducted in subjects. There was a significant difference between the patency rate at the last follow-up visit (87.5% vs. 29.6%) and the 1-year patency rate (86.0% vs. 54.8%) between the test and control groups. The change in the C in CEAP classification pre- and post-procedure was significantly different between the test and control groups (1.61 ± 0.21 vs. 0.69 ± 0.23). In addition, at the last follow-up visit, VCSS and CIVIQ Score were both significantly different between the test and control groups (7.57 ± 0.27 vs. 0.69 ± 0.23; 22.67 ± 3.01 vs. 39.34 ± 6.66, respectively).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The stenting of iliac vein obstruction following CDT in lower extremity DVT may increase the patency of the deep vein, and thus provides better efficacy and quality of life.</p>

Radical correction of Budd-Chiari syndrome / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Interventional therapy is widely accepted as the first choice for the treatment of the Budd-Chiari syndrome, but the use of radical correctional therapy should not be discarded. This study describes radical correction by controlling bleeding from distal end of pathological segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and discusses potential surgical errors and postoperative complications.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Of the 216 patients in the study, 78 were treated with simple membranectomy, 64 with dissection of the pathological segment of the IVC and vascular prosthesis or pericardial patch plasty, 60 with resection of the pathological segment of the IVC and orthotopic graft transplantation with vascular prosthesis, and 14 with resection of the occlusive main hepatic vein and its upper IVC, hepatic venous outflow plasty and vascular prosthesis orthotopic graft transplantation from the hepatic venous entrance to the IVC of right atrial ostium.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Except 14 cases who were discharged after hepatic vein outflow plasty, four cases died postoperatively, and 198 patients were discharged without complications. The symptoms of 15 patients were relieved partially and 2 without any change. There were no deaths intraoperatively. Of the 112 cases who were followed up for 72 months, 13 suffered from a relapse.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Radical correction is a beneficial therapy in the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome.</p>