Síndrome de POEMS, el desafío diagnóstico de un caso infrecuente / POEMS syndrome, the diagnostic challenge of an infrequent case / Síndrome de POEMS, o desafio diagnóstico de um caso infrequente

Se reporta el caso de un hombre de 45 años con síntomas y signos consistentes con el Sindrome de POEMS (del inglés: polineuropatía, organomegalia, endocrinopatía, gammapatía monoclonal y cambios dérmicos), un raro desorden paraneoplásico. El mismo contaba con antecedentes de tabaquismo, hipotiroidismo y últimamente había perdido 20 kg de peso. Se destaca que una historia clínica y revisión detallada seguida de estudios de laboratorio, radiología y biopsia de médula ósea, entre otros, son herramientas necesarias para reconocer los componentes de este síndrome y no demorar el diagnóstico. El paciente presentó 2 criterios obligatorios (gammapatía monoclonal y neuropatia periférica sensitivo-motora), un criterio mayor (lesión ósea) y varios criterios menores (desórdenes endocrinos, manifestaciones cutáneas, organomegalia). Actualmente se encuentra bajo supervisión hematológica y continúa su seguimiento neurológico, lo que muestra una buena respuesta a la terapia específica. Las enfermedades raras como este síndrome resultan un desafío diagnóstico para los profesionales de la salud.

The case of a 45 - year- old- man whose symptoms and signs were consistent with POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy and skin changes), a rare paraneoplastic disorder, has been reported. He had a previous history of smoking, hypothyroidism and a 20 kg weight loss. It was emphasized that a detailed clinical history and examination followed by laboratory and radiological studies and bone marrow biopsy, among others tests, were necessary in order to recognise the components of this syndrome and not to delay the time of diagnosis. This patient had two mandatory criteria (monoclonal gammopathy and sensorimotor polyneuropathy), one major criterion (bone lesion) and several minor criteria (endocrine disorders, cutaneous manifestations, organomegaly). He is currently under the supervision of the doctors of the hematology department and continues neurological follow-up, having a good response to the specific therapy. Rare diseases like this syndrome are a diagnostic challenge for health professionals.

Informa-se o caso de um homem de 45 anos com sintomas e sinais compatíveis com a Síndrome de POEMS (do inglês: polineuropatia, organomegalia, endocrinopatia, gamopatia monoclonal e alterações cutâneas), um distúrbio paraneoplásico raro. O homem tinha antecedentes de tabagismo, hipotiroidismo e ultimamente tinha perdido 20 kg de peso. Enfatizamos que um prontuario médico e exame detalhado, seguido de estudos de laboratório e radiológicos, e uma biópsia de medula óssea, dentre outros, são ferramentas necessárias para reconhecer os componentes desta síndrome e não demorar o tempo de diagnóstico. Nosso paciente apresentou dois critérios obrigatórios (gamopatia monoclonal e neuropatia periférica sensório-motora), um critério maior (lesão óssea) e vários critérios menores (anormalidades endócrinas, alterações cutâneas, organomegalia). Encontra-se atualmente sob supervisão hematológica e continua seu seguimento neurológico, mostrando uma resposta boa à tera,pia concreta. Doenças raras como essa síndrome são um desafio diagnóstico para os profissionais da saúde.

Utility of AgNor, immunocytochemistry for CEA and tumor markers for diagnosis in serous fluids

Objective: The evaluation of serous fluids stained by morphological methods lacks, in many cases, the necessary accuracy to obtain the correct diagnostics. The objective of this work was to establish the value of complementary tools for the improvement of diagnosis in serous effusions. Methods: Fifty-six serous effusions were processed for morphological staining, immunocytochemistry of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), AgNOR counting and electrochemiluminescense immunoassay for tumor markers (TM): CEA, Ca125 and CYFRA 21-1. TM assays were also performed in sera from the same patients. The Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp) were evaluated for all the methods. Results: Cytology: Se 73 per cent, Sp 100 per cent, CEA by immunocytochemistry: Se 96 per cent, Sp 75 per cent, AgNOR:Se 86 per cent, Sp100 per cent, TM: a) in fluids: CEA, Ca125 and CYFRA 21-1, Se: 29 per cent, 66 per cent and 64 per cent respectively and Sp: 100 por cento, 87 por cento and 100 por cento respectively. b) in sera: CEA, Ca125 and CYFRA 21-1: Se: 27 per cent, 77 per cent and 47 per cent respectively and Sp: 100 per cent, 25 per cent and 75 per cent respectively. CEA (in cells) + TM (fluids): Se 100 per cent and Sp 75 per cent AgNOR + TM (fluids): Se 95 per cent and Sp 87 per cent TM Panel (CEA+Ca125+CYFRA 21-1): a) in fluids: Se 81 per cent and Sp 87 per cent b) in sera: Se 86 per cent and Sp 12 per cent Conclusion: AgNOR assay and immunocytochemistry for CEA were useful as complementary tools in the diagnosis using effusions, raising the Sensitivity of the Cytology from 73 per cent to 86 per cent and 96 per cent respectively. Sensitivity increased with the assays for a panel of TM in fluids, but the high costof these methods does not justify their use for non-conclusive smears.

Utilidad de los marcadores tumorales en líquidos de punción pleural / Usefulness of tumor markers in pleural fluids

El diagnóstico de la neoplasia pleural se basa en la demostración de células neoplásicas en fluido pleural (FP) o en biopsias de pleura. Sin embargo, aún en casos de malignidad hay un elevado porcentaje de informes falsos negativos (30-60%). Los FP neoplásicos presentan valores detectables de marcadores tumorales (MT) producidos por las células neoplásicas de la pleura. El objetivo de este trabajo ha sido evaluar la utilidad diagnóstica de algunos marcadores tumorales, de uso corriente en el laboratorio, en los fluidos de punción pleural. En 20 de ellos se analizaron: Antígeno cárcinoembrionario (CEA), fragmentos de la citoqueratina 19 (CYFRA 21-1) y Antígeno CA 125. Se efectuó el estudio fisicoquímico, recuento celular y examen citológico (Papanicolaou). En algunos casos se realizó diagnóstico anátomo-patológico. Los MT se dosaron por inmunoensayo de electroquimioluminiscencia. La comparación se efectuó por Kruskal-Wallis. Las muestras fueron clasificadas en 4 grupos y se determinó en cada uno mediana y rango para CEA (ng/mL), CYFRA (ng/mL) y CA 125 (UI/mL), respectivamente: 1) Citología positiva con diagnóstico previo de cáncer de pulmón (n: 5) 112 (2,3-1.610), 134,4 (45,8-600), 1.048 (498-2999); 2) Citología positiva con diagnóstico previo de cáncer de otro origen (n: 4) 15,28 (1,1-93,80), 108,1 (7,42-497,2), 1.827 (1.103-14.130); 3) Citología negativa con diagnóstico incierto (n: 4) 1,89 (0,91-2,96), 17,1 (1,5-29,6), 578,2 (27,8-12); 4) Citología no concluyente con diagnóstico incierto (n: 7) 31,8 (1,28-370,2), 96,3 (23,8-860), 585 (94,4-4.584). Se observó diferencia significativa entre los grupos. La combinación de citología y MT aumentó el diagnóstico de neoplasia pleural en 25%. Los resultados preliminares permiten concluir que un panel de marcadores tumorales en FP, sumado a los estudios tradicionales, representa una ayuda diagnóstica.

The diagnosis of pleural cancer is supported by the demonstration of neoplastic cells in pleural fluid or in pleural biopsies. However, even in malignancy there are a great number of false negatives results (30-60%). Tumor fluids. To establish the value of different tumor markers, frequently used in clinical laboratories, in the diagnosis of pleural fluids. 20 pleural fluids were processed for physical and chemical study, cellular counting, morphological examination (Papanicolaou stain) and electrochemiluminescense immunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CYFRA 21-1 and CA 125. The results were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis. In some cases, biopsies were performed. The samples were classified in four groups, and the median and rank were calculated in each case (CEA, CYFRA and CA 125). 1) Positive cytology with previous diagnosis of lung cancer (n: 5) 112 (2.3-1610), 134.4 (45.8-600), 1048 (498-2999) 2) Positive cytology with previous diagnosis of not-lung cancer(n: 4) 15.28 (1.1-93.80), 108.1 (7.42- 497.2),1827 (1103-14130), 3) Negative cytology with uncertain diagnosis (n: 4)1.89 (0.91- 2.96), 17.1 (1.5-29.6), 578.2 (27.8-12, 4) Inconclusive cytology with uncertain diagnosis (n: 7) 31.8 (1.28-370.2), 96.3 (23.8-860), 585 (94.4 -4584). There were stastistic differences among the four groups. Joining the cytology to the assays for tumor markers raised sensitivity by 25%. The assay for tumor markers can be a complementary tool in the diagnosis of effusions.