RESUMO
Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of intravenous chemotherapy combined with TACE in the treatment of gastric cancer with hepatic metastasis.Methods In this study 60 gastric cancer patients with hepatic metastasis were divided into two groups randomly,the trial group (30 cases) took intravenous chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenous drip d1,oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenous drip d1 followed by 5-fiuorouracil 500 mg/m2 intravenous drip d1-5 after TACE.The control group (30 cases) took the same chemotherapy protocol and one treatment cycle covering 4 weeks.Results The overall response rate in trial group was 53％ and the increase rate of Karnofsky was 70％ while that was 37％ and 40％ respectively in the control group (P ＜ 0.05).The median overall survival of trial group was 13 months and which was 8 months in the control group (P ＜ 0.05),meanwhile the toxicities and side reactions of trial group didn't increase notably.Conclusions Intravenous chemotherapy combined with TACE is safe and more effective in the treatment of gastric cancer with hepatic metastasis.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with double contrast enhanced ultrasound ( DCUS) in the preoperative staging of gastric malignancies. Methods This study included 162 patients with biopsy proven gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection as primary management of their malignancies. All patients underwent DCUS and EUS prior to surgical intervention with the results of the ultrasound findings compared with the pathological stages of the resected specimen. Results Among the 162 gastric cancer patients, there were 42 cases of T1, 49 cases of T2, 56 cases of T3, and 15 cases of T4 tumors. The overall accuracy of DCUS and EUS for the determination of loco-regional tumor infiltration ( T Staging) was 77. 2% and 74. 7% , (χ2 = 0. 273, P = 0. 603). Comparison of ultrasound techniques revealed that DCUS was superior to EUS only for a tumor depth of T3 (χ2 =5. 009, P = 0.025). Lymph nodes were correctly staged with DCUS and EUS in 78.4% and 57. 4% of cases, respectively ( χ2 = 16. 370,P =0.001). Using DCUS, the sensitivity of the technique was 78. 4% with a specificity of 78. 5%. In comparison, EUS had a sensitivity of 49. 5% with a specificity of 69. 2%. DCUS also detected a higher incidence of positive lymph nodes than EUS for poorly differentiated (81. 5% vs. 42. 6% ,χ2 =17. 338, P < 0. 01) and overall tumor types (78.4% vs. 49. 5% , χ2 = 17.523, P < 0. 01). Conclusions Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography offers another noninvasive approach for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer. DCUS was comparable to EUS in tumor depth evaluation. DCUS offers an advantage in the detection of lymph node metastases, especially in poorly differentiated tumors.