Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 326-329, 2012.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-427088

RESUMO

ObjectiveThe study is to investigate the predictive values of dosimetric parameters and patient related factors in severe acute radiation pneumonitis (SARP) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods In all,147 NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and 3DCRT between 2006 and 2010 was collected.Independent sample t test was used to compare parameter values between patients with SARP and those without SARP.Logistic regression was used to identify significant determined factor.Predictive value of each parameter was tested by ROC analysis.Pearson correlation was used to analyze correlations between parameters.Represent factors were identified by factor analysis.ResultsThe incidence of SARP was 9.5% ( 14/147 ).The means lung dose (MLD),V20,V30,V40,and V50 ( x2 =4.87 -6.84,P =0.009 -0.025,respectively ) were determining factors for SARP.Our datasets shows that for SARP <5%,MLD,V20,V30,V40 and V50 should be ≤16.77 Gy,V20≤34.15%,.V30 ≤23.62%,.V40 ≤ 18.57%,V50 ≤ 13.02%.ROC analysis show that areas under MLD,V20,V30,V40 and V50 curves was corresponding to 0.678,0.661,0.667,0.677,and 0.651,respectively.In addition,the sensitivity and specificity of each parameter at cutoff values are:78.0% and 48.1% for MLD;42.9% and 82.0% for V2o ;78.6% and 52.9% for V30 ;71.4% and 61.7% for V40,and 57.1% and 67.7% for V50.Factor analysis suggest that we can choose 1 or 2 parameters from MLD,V20,or V30,and another from V40 or V50 for predicting.The incidence of SARP was greater in patients with tumorsin right lower lung than other locations ( 22.2% vs 6.7%,x2 =6.19,P =0.0 2 3 ).Conclusions The MLD,V20,V30,V40 and V50 are determining factors for SARP.As predictive value of each parameter alone is relatively week,using two or more parameters to predict SARP is recommended.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 315-320, 2012.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-427073

RESUMO

ObjectiveTo evaluate the local failure and the impact on survival by prospectively comparing involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer ( LA-NSCLC ).Methods LANSCLC patients were treated with 2 cycles of carboplatin ( AUC =5 - 6,d1 ) combined with paclitaxel ( 175mg/m2 ),followed assessment without distant metastasis,then randomized into IFRT (45 patients) or ENI (54 patients) arm.IFRT included primary tumor,ipsilateral hilar and positive mediastinal lymph nodes;ENI included the primary lesion,ipsilateral hilar,hilateral mediastinal lymph node drainage and bilateral supraclavicular area.The prescription dose was given as high as possible with V20 ≤35% and spinal cord dose ≤50 Gy,combined weekly paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 concurrent chemotherapy.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival data and the log-rank method was used to test distribution of survival time between arms.ResultsThe follow-up rate was 99%.49,29 and 17 patients were followed-up for 1-,2-and 3-year,respectively.More patients from group IFRT received >60 Gy than ENI (49% vs.26%,x2 =5.59,P =0.018 ).The local failure rates were 29% and 36%,respectively ( x2 =0.46,P =0.497 ).The 1-,2-and 3-year local tumor progression-free survival rates were 76%,69%,65% and 80%,53%,49% ( x2 =0.74,P =0.389),respectively; the 1-,3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 80%,41%,33% and 69%,32%,13% (x2 =3.97,P =0.046),respectively.There were no significant differences in acute and late toxicities between the arms ( x2 =3.910 - 0.155,P =0.142 - 0.925 ).ConclusionsIFRT improved radiation dose and survival rate and did not increase the failure of elective lymph node region compared with ENI.The toxicities were no differences between IFRT and ENL Further investigation with big size sample is warranted.

3.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 500-503, 2012.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-430115

RESUMO

Objective To evaluatc the efficacy and safcty of recombinant endostatin (Endostar)combined with concurrent radio-chemotherapy (CRCT) in patients with unresectable stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods From March 2009 to November 2011,47 patients received threedimensional conformal radiotherapy of 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions over 6-7 weeks And concurrent chemotherapy of docetaxel 65 mg/m2 and cisplatin 65 mg/m2.Endostar was administered once a week before and on week 2,4,6 during CRCT at a dose level of 7.5 mg/m2/d.Tumor response was evaluated with thoracic CT scans performed 4 weeks after completion of treatment in accordance with RECIST 1.1 criteria.Acute toxicities were evaluated in accordance with CTCAE 3.0.Results Forty-four patients completed treatment and toxicity evaluation,42 patients completed evaluation of efficacy.Five patients achieved complete response,29 partial response,3 stable disease,and 5 progressive disease,2 were net assessed.Overall response rate was 77%.One-year overall survival rate was 81%,and one-year progression-free survival rate was 51%.Twelve patients died,2 died of treatment related toxicities,8 of cancer,and 2 of unknown causes.Nineteen patients developed grade 3/4 neutrocytopenia,grade 3 acute esophagitis and pneumonitis were observed in 4 and 4 patients,respectively,and 1 patient died of pneumonitis.No patient developed cardiovascular toxicities and hemorrhage.Conclusions Endostar combined with CRCT for unresectable stage Ⅲ NSCLC was safe and the short term outcomes were promising.Further investigations are warranted.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA