RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the coagulation function and relevant factors of adults patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with pegasparase (PEG-ASP) or L-asaraginase (L-ASP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical features of 153 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received L-ASP or PEG-ASP in our hospital from January 2010 to January 2015 year were analyzed retrospectively. Among 153 patients, 108 patients received L-ASP treatment and 45 patients received PEG-ASP treatment. The change of coagulation function and the incidence of complications of 2 treated groups were compared, and the influence of differenent using time of L-ASP on above mentioned factors were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The age, sex, white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis, subtype and risk factors of disease, total effective rate and complication rates showed no significant difference in the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The total infusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate and fibrinogen (FIB) also showed no significant difference (P = 0.12, 0.65, 0.09). FIB levels decreased slower after treatment of PEG-ASP (9.49 vs 6.90) (P = 0.000) than that after treatment of L-ASP. When L-ASP used at interval, FIB level decreased slower than that of continuous use. However, the risk of bleeding is higher when used at interval early (P = 0.01, 0.013).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Using PEG-ASP can better monitor the coagulation function than L-ASP. L-ASP used at interval can monitor the coagulation function easily, but its early use may cause an increased incidence of complications.</p>