Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of Practical Radiology ; (12): 811-814,832, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-752446

RESUMO

Objective Toevaluatetheclinicaleffectofinterventionaltreatmentfordelayedhemorrhageinpatientsafterabdominal surgery.Methods Dataof76patients,undergoingangiographyduetodelayedpostoperativehemorrhage,wereanalyzedretrospectively. Theexclusioncriteriaincludedpositiveangiographywithoutembolizationorhaemorrhagecausedbyothercauses(urologicaland reproductivesystemdiseases).Basedonendovascularprocedures,thepatientsweredividedintoembolizedgroup (positiveangiography withembolization)andnon-embolizedgroup(negativeangiographywithoutembolization).Theoutcomesoftreatmentwerecompared betweentwogroupsandfactorsassociatedwithrebleedingwerealsoanalyzed.Results Angiogramswerepositivein70% (53/76)of patients,andintravascularembolizationswereperformed.Intheembolizationgroup,technicalsuccessrateandclinicalsuccessrate were98.1%(52/53)and71.7%(38/53),respectively.Noseverecomplications,suchasgastrointestinalorhepaticischemicnecrosis wereobservedinallpatients.Therebleedingrateswere28.3%and52.2%intheembolizationgroupandthenon-embolizationgroup, respectively(P=0.046).Multivariateanalysisshowedthatuseofvasopressoragentsbeforesurgerywasanindependentriskfactor forrebleeding (P=0.022).Conclusion Intravascularinterventionaltherapyisasafeandeffectivemethodfordelayedhemorrhageafter abdominalsurgery.Useofvasopressoragentsbeforesurgerymayincreasetheriskofpostoperativerebleeding.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA