Long-term results of the Scorpio posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate long-term result of Scorpio posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>There were 160 patients (240 knees) underwent Scorpio posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty between December 1998 and December 2000, which were performed by the same surgeon. Patients were followed up from June 2013 to December 2013. Knee Society Scoring (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) patellofemoral scoring, standard weight-bearing anteroposterior and patellar tangential radiographs were assessed. Satisfaction of outcome was requested. Alignment of components and presence of radiolucent lines were assessed by the radiographic scoring system of knee society. Paired t-test was used compared to the data between preoperation and the time of last follow-up.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Ninety-five patients (141 knees) (59.4%) were followed up. Average follow-up duration was 13.3 years (range 12 to 15 years). Eight knees were revised due to periprosthetic infection (4 knees), aseptic loosening of tibial tray (3 knees) and wear-out of polyethylene insert (1 knee). Compared with preoperative ones, KSS knee score, KSS functional score and range of motion improved significantly (pre-operation: 26±16, 34±18, 87°±25°; follow-up time: 93±8, 78±27, 114°±22°) (t=45.55, 15.60, 13.03, all P<0.01). In terms of KSS knee score and HSS patellofemoral score, 106 knees were rated as excellence respectively. Ninety-five knees had satisfaction with outcome for maximum. The presences of radiolucent lines occurred around 5 femoral and 11 tibial components with range less than 2 mm. The survival rate at 10 years was 94.5% with revision for any reason as the end point.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The long-term study indicates that Scorpio posterior-stabilized knee system shows favorable clinical and radiological results.</p>

Comparison and estimation of different diagnostic methods in detecting the presence of periprosthetic joint infection / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare and estimate the diagnostic value and characteristic of different diagnostic methods (blood laboratory test, histological analysis, synovial fluid cytological test and microbiological examination) in detecting the presence of periprosthetic joint infection.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Data of 52 patients underwent hip or knee joint revision in Peking University People's Hospital Arthritis Clinic and Research Center between July 2013 and March 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. For each patient, results of blood laboratory tests(peripheral-blood white blood cell, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP)), histological analysis, synovial fluid white cell count (SWCC), microbiological examinations (synovial fluid, tissue and prosthetic joint sonication fluid) were collected. Data were analyzed by t-test, independent sample median test or χ(2) test, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for each method were calculated and compared by receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 30 female and 22 male patients. Twenty-one patients (40.4%) were diagnosed as PJI. The levels of CRP, ESR, IL-6 and Hs-CRP in patients with PJI were higher than that in aseptic failure patients (Z=23.084, 13.499, 5.796, 17.045, all P<0.05). The sensitivities of CRP, ESR, IL-6 and Hs-CRP were 90.5%, 81.0%, 95.0% and 90.0%. The sensitivities of histological analysis and SWCC were 55.0% and 70.6%, while they had high specificity as 89.7% and 85.7%. The sensitivity of sonication fluid culture was 90.0%, which was higher than that of tissue culture (71.4%) and synovial fluid culture (65.0%) (χ(2) = 5.333, 6.400, all P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The tests of CRP, ESR, IL-6 and Hs-CRP have good value in detecting PJI preoperatively. Histological analysis and SWCC have high specificity, which could help to exclude PJI. Sonication fluid culture has a higher sensitivity than tissue culture and synovial fluid culture.</p>

The arthroscopic classification of degenerative medial meniscus injury / 中华骨科杂志

Objective To explore the classification of degenerative medial meniscus injury under arthroscopy and its clinical significance.Methods This study involved 122 patients who underwent arthroscopic operation because of degenerative medial meniscus injury from January 2012 to December 2012,eliminating patients who received synovectomy for severe synovitis.There were 27 males and 95 females,with 63 left knees and 59 right knees.The average age was 61.8±8.9 years.The average BMI was 26.5±3.4 kg/m2,while the average preoperative Lysholm score was 47.2± 15.0.The cartilage injury was estimated by Outerbridge classification system during arthroscopic surgery.Both the difference of the preoperative Lysholm score and the number of articular surfaces with Ⅳ degree of cartilage injury were compared among different types of degenerative medial meniscus injury.Resuits The horizon tear of posterior horn group included 33 patients.The average number of articular surfaces with Ⅳ degree of cartilage injury was 1.24± 1.48 while the average preoperative Lysholm score was 52.5± 14.4 points,with pain score of 7.7±6.5.The root injury of posterior horn group included 16 patients,whose average number of articular surfaces with 1Ⅳ degree of cartilage injury was 1.13±1.26 and average preoperative Lysholm score was 37.5±8.4 points,with pain score of 3.1±4.0.The complex serious injury group included 73 patients.The average number of articular surfaces with Ⅳ degree of cartilage injury was 2.26±1.61 and the average preoperative Lysholm score was 46.9±15.3 points,with pain score of 6.8±5.4.Both the preoperative Lysholm score and pain score of the root injury of posterior horn group was significantly lower than that of the horizon tear and the complex serious injury group.The average number of articular surfaces with Ⅳ degree of cartilage injury between the root injury and the horizon tear of posterior horn group had no significant difference.The number of these two groups was less than the complex serious injury group,with statistically significant difference.Conclusion The arthroscopic classification of degenerative medial meniscus injury could be classified into three types.The degenerative cartilage injury of root injury of posterior horn and horizon tear of posterior horn is relatively mild,which are the early stages of joint degeneration.However,the clinical symptoms and disability caused by root injury of posterior horn are more severe.On the other hand,the degenerative cartilage injury of complex serious injury is relatively severe,which belongs to the late stage,while the clinical symptoms and disability are relatively mild.