Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
JAMC-Journal of Ayub Medical College-Abbotabad-Pakistan. 2003; 15 (4): 34-6
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-62393

RESUMO

The diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection was initially being made through invasive methods but now non invasive methods have been developed to make the diagnosis easier. The present study was done to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a two non invasive tests i.e. Helicobacter pylori Stool antigen test [HpSA] and Helicobacter pylori IgG serology with an invasive method i.e. Campylobacter like organism [CLO] gel test. Methods. The study was conducted in the gastroenterology unit of Pakistan Medical Research Council Research Centre Karachi. Adult patients with gastroduodenal disease were selected for study and their medical history was recorded. Endoscopy was done on all patients and the antral biopsy sample was tested for H.pylori using CLO test. Serology [IgG] was done elsewhere using ELISA and titers of over 50 units were recorded as positive. HpSA was done to determine the presence of H.pylori antigen in stool. Results. Out of 43 patients 34 [79%] were males and 9 [21%] females. The main presenting symptom was epigastric pain in 74% cases. Although H.pylori IgG antibody titers of over 50 were taken as positive but for this study titres of over 100 were taken as significant for comparison with other tests. CLO test was positive in 26 [60.5%] cases, H. Pylori antibody titers of over 100 IU were present in 33 [76.7%] cases and HpSA in 21 [48.8%]. Using CLO test as the gold standard the sensitivity of serology was 81% and that of HpSA 65% with a 29% and 76% specificity respectively. Conclusion. In our setting CLO test is still the best diagnostic test for H. Pylori detection. Both non invasive tests i.e. serology and stool HpSA are less sensitive than CLO but amongst each other both are equally sensitive


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/imunologia , Testes Sorológicos
2.
EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2001; 7 (4-5): 787-790
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-157996

RESUMO

Albendazole and metronidazole were compared in 68 patients diagnosed positive for giardiasis. Albendazole 1200 mg, one dose was given to 24 patients, albendazole 400 mg twice a day for 3 days was given to 23 patients, and metronidazole 400 mg 3 times a day for 5 days to 21 patients. Response to therapy was monitored by clinical examination and analysis of fresh faecal samples on days 0, 3, 7 and 10. Response to the single dose of albendazole was 55%, to the divided dose of albendazole 70%, and to metronidazole 84%. The results show that albendazole, originally recommended for helminthic infection, can also be used in patients with mixed protozoal infection or for infections resistant to metronidazole


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antiprotozoários , Resistência a Medicamentos , Fezes/parasitologia , Giardíase/tratamento farmacológico , Metronidazol
3.
JPMA-Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2001; 51 (10): 341-343
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-57337
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA