Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 8 (4): 456-462
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-147195

RESUMO

Spinal anesthesia has replaced general anesthesia in obstetric practice. Hemodynamic instability is a common, but preventable complication of spinal anesthesia. Preloading the circulation with intravenous fluids is considered a safe and effective method of preventing hypotension following spinal anesthesia. We had conducted a study to compare the hemodynamic stability after volume preloading with either Ringer's lactate [RL] or tetrastarch hydroxyethyl starch [HES] or succinylated gelatin [SG] in the patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. It was a prospective, double-blinded and randomized controlled study. Ninety six ASA-I healthy, nonlaboring parturients were randomly divided in 3 groups HES, SG, RL [n = 32 each] and received 10 ml/kg HES 130/0.4; 10 ml/kg SG [4% modified fluid gelatin] and 20 ml/kg RL respectively prior to SA scheduled for cesarean section. Heart rate, blood pressure [BP], oxygen saturation was measured. The fall in systolic blood pressure [SBP] [<100 mm Hg] noted among 5 [15.63%], 12 [37.5%] and 14 [43.75%] parturients in groups HES, SG, RL respectively. Vasopressor [phenylephrine] was used to treat hypotension when SBP <90 mm Hg. Both the results and APGAR scores were comparable in all the groups. Lower preloading volume and less intra-operative vasopressor requirement was noted in HES group for maintaining BP though it has no clinical significance. RL which is cheap, physiological and widely available crystalloid can preload effectively and maintain hemodynamic stability well in cesarean section and any remnant hypotension can easily be manageable with vasopressor

2.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 8 (1): 25-29
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-138054

RESUMO

Postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] frequently hampers implementation of ambulatory surgery in spite of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens. the study was carried out to compare the efficacy of Ramosetron and Ondansetron in preventing PONV after ambulatory surgery. It was a prospective, double blinded, and randomized controlled study. 124 adult patients of either sex, aged 25-55, of ASA physical status I and II, scheduled for day care surgery, were randomly allocated into Group A [[n=62] receiving [IV] Ondansetron [4 mg]] and Group B [[n=62] receiving IV Ramosetron [0.3 mg]] prior to the induction of general anesthesia in a double-blind manner. Episodes of PONV were noted at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 h, 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively. Statistically significant difference between Groups A and B [P <0.05] was found showing that Ramosetron was superior to Ondansetron as antiemetic both regarding frequency and severity. it was evident that preoperative prophylactic administration of single dose IV Ramosetron [0.3 mg] has better efficacy than single dose IV Ondansetron [4 mg] in reducing the episodes of PONV over 18 h postoperatively in patients undergoing day-care surgery under general anesthesia


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/tratamento farmacológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Ondansetron , Benzimidazóis , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Ondansetron/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Estudos Prospectivos , Anestesia Geral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA