Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Tunisie Medicale [La]. 2015; 93 (10): 646-650
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-177423

RESUMO

Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding [UGIB] is a common pediatric emergency. Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy [EGD] is the first line diagnostic procedure to identify the source of bleeding. However etiology of UGIB remains unknown in 20% of cases. Furthermore, emergency endoscopy is unavailable in many hospitals in our country


Aims: Identify clinical predictors of positive upper endoscopy outcomes and develop a clinical prediction rule from these parameters


Methods:Retrospective study of EGDs performed in children with first episode of UGIB, in the endoscopic unit of Children's Hospital of Tunis, during a period of six years. Statistical analysis used SPSS20. Univariate analysis was performed and multivariate logistic regression was then modelled to derive a clinical prediction rule


Results: We collected 655 endoscopies [23.2% normal, 76.8% pathological]. We found that time to EGD within 24 hours from the onset of bleeding [p=0.027; Adj OR: 3.30 [1.14 - 9.53]], rebleeding [p=0.009; Adj OR: 6.01 [1.57 - 23.02]], positive gastric lavage outcome [p=0.001; Adj OR: 4.79 [1.95 - 11.79]] and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intake [p=0.035; Adj OR: 5.66 [1.13 - 28.31]] were predictors of positive upper endoscopy outcomes. By assigning each factor, the adjusted odds ratio [Adj OR], we developed a score with four items, ranging from 4 to 20. Using the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve the best cut off >/= 9 was defined [sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 60.6%, positive predictive value 92.7% and negative predictive value 47.6%]. The score discriminated well with a ROC curve area of 0.837 [95% confidence interval [0.769 - 0.905]]


Conclusions: This clinical prediction rule is a simple measure that may identify children who needed emergency endoscopy. A prospective study is required to validate our results and evaluate other clinical features that were insufficient for this analysis

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA