Effectiveness of ampicillin and combination of penicillin and chloramphenicol in the treatment of pneumonias: randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of ampicillin and a combination of benzyl penicillin and chloramphenicol in the treatment of pneumonias. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients 5 months to 4 years old with pneumonias of < 2 weeks duration. Exclusion criteria included acute bronchiolitis, allergy to penicillin, postmeasles pneumonia or prior administration of trial antibiotics in full dose for more than 2 days. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either ampicillin (100 mg/kg/day) or combination of benzyl penicillin (100,000 units/kg/day) and chloramphenicol (100 mg/kg/day). The outcome measure was cure rate. RESULTS: There were 52 and 49 patients in the ampicillin and the combination groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between groups except, nasal flare and cyanosis which were less in benzyl penicillin plus chloramphenicol group. There was also no difference either in the primary outcome, cure rate or secondary outcomes (days for cure, duration of tachypnea, fever and grunt) in the two. CONCLUSION: Considering the potential toxicity of chloramphenicol and the number of injections and doses to be given for the combination, ampicillin as a single drug could be preferred for the treatment of pneumonias, in this part of the country.

Missed opportunities for immunization in children under 2 years attending an urban teaching hospital.

A cross-sectional survey was done to assess the missed opportunity for immunization (MOI) in children under two years of age attending Medical Outpatient, Newborn Follow-up Service and Immunization Clinic of Institute of Child Health and to evaluate interventions. Baseline survey phase-I was done and two interventions: (i) education and awareness of immunization among health personnel; and (ii) attaching immunization slip to the outpatient form were done. After each intervention phase-II and phase-III surveys were carried out. The data from the different phases were analyzed for the effect of interventions. The total number of children surveyed were 634; 423 from Medical Outpatients, 108 from Newborn Follow-up Service and 103 from immunization Clinic. MOI was 35.5%, 23.1% and 9.7% in the above health facilities, respectively. After intervention I, the MOI was 24.5% and 12.2% in Medical Outpatient and Newborn Follow-up Service and none in Immunization Clinic. After intervention-II there was an improvement in immunization of 18.4%, 30.4% and 16.0% in the three health facilities mentioned above. MOI was avoided because the medical officers advised immunization in the above children. The difference in the MOI among Medical Outpatient and Immunization Clinic between baseline, phase-I and phase-II were significant (p < 0.001). It is concluded that MOI can be brought down by creating awareness periodically and that attaching an immunization schedule to the outpatient forms is an effective method of reducing MOI.

Etiological agents of acute poliomyelitis in south India.

This study was done to identify the specific etiological agents that cause acute poliomyelitis (APM). All the children newly diagnosed clinically as APM at the Institute of Child Health, Madras, during the period May 1988 to May 1989 were recruited. Stool specimen collection, transportation and identification of viruses by culture were done by standard procedures. The total number of children recruited was 312. Specimens were contaminated/insufficient in 10. Analysis was done for 302 cases. Polio virus type II was identified in 25.5% children, type I in 18.5%, type III in 15.9%, multiple polioviruses in 6.3% and non-polio enteroviruses (NPEV) in 20.2% cases. No virus was identified in 13.6%. Among the APM cases clinically diagnosed, the proportion of NPEV has increased considerably from 5% in 1984 to 20.2% in 1988-89. The age distribution was not significantly different between polio viruses and NPEV. The distribution of polio viruses and NPEV did not differ significantly in relation to immunization status, source of water supply, method of excreta disposal and the clinical types. For surveillance and control/eradication program of poliomyelitis, laboratory confirmation is essential.