RESUMO
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the inter-reliability of the Braden scale and its subscales for different patients assisted in the intensive care unit. We hypothesized that the Braden scale has low reliability in different populations. METHODS: This reliability study involved the Braden scale in intensive care unit of a hospital. A total of 200 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit in four different groups: neurological patients, sepsis, elderly, and adults affected by trauma. The Braden scale is a tool composed of six subscales for patient assessment: sensory perception, humidity, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction. The total score was also calculated. The Braden scale was applied by two different nurses with an interval of 20-30 min between applications. RESULTS: For all populations, kappa values considered unsuitable were observed for most categories of the Braden scale, ranging from 0.06-0.25. Only for the total Braden scale score was moderate reliability identified in all groups evaluated, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.48-0.75. CONCLUSIONS: Braden scale is not a reliable tool to be used in the intensive care unit, and we do not recommend the use of this scale to assess the risk of developing pressure injury.
RESUMO
Abstract The number of deaths from COVID-19 is closely associated with multimorbidities. This study aimed to review the clinical and functional conditions of patients who recovered from COVID-19. Additionally, identify the relationship with risk factors and comorbidities. Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) was more frequently observed in patients with severe COVID-19. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the comorbidities that has contributed the most to the increase in the number of hospitalizations due to complications and the number of deaths due to infection by COVID-19. Obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 under 60 years of age. Most survivors of COVID-19 suffer primarily from muscle fatigue or weakness. In addition, patients who were more seriously ill during their hospital stay have greater impairment of functional capacity, pulmonary diffusion and fatigue symptoms, and are the main target population for long-term recovery interventions. To optimize the post-hospitalization rehabilitation of patients after discharge from COVID-19, the need for multidisciplinary work in rehabilitation, the reinforcement of public policies to ensure equity in access to the public health system and training should be considered of the health team in view of the new demands and realities generated by COVID-19.
Resumo O número de mortes por COVID-19 está intimamente associado a multimorbidades. O presente estudo teve como objetivo revisar as condições clínicas e funcionais de pacientes que se recuperaram da COVID-19. Adicionalmente, identificar a relação com fatores de risco e comorbidades. A hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) foi observada com mais frequência em pacientes com COVID-19 grave. O diabetes mellitus (DM) é uma das comorbidades que mais tem contribuído para o aumento do número de internações por complicações e do número de óbitos por infecção por COVID-19. A obesidade demonstrou ser um fator de risco para hospitalização em pacientes com COVID-19 com menos de 60 anos. A maioria dos sobreviventes da COVID-19 sofre principalmente de fadiga ou fraqueza muscular. Além disso, os pacientes que estiveram mais gravemente enfermos durante sua internação hospitalar apresentam maior prejuízo da capacidade funcional, pior difusão pulmonar e sintomas de fadiga, sendo assim a população-alvo para intervenções de recuperação a longo prazo.. Para otimizar a reabilitação pós-hospitalização de pacientes após alta por COVID-19, deve-se considerar a necessidade de trabalho multiprofissional na reabilitação, o reforço das políticas públicas para garantir a equidade no acesso ao sistema público de saúde e o treinamento da equipe de saúde frente às novas demandas e realidades geradas pelo COVID-19.
RESUMO
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with individuals over 18 years old of both sexes, with Brazilian Portuguese as their native language. The structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The model fit was evaluated by the following indices: root mean square error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis index, standardized root mean square residual, and χ²/degrees of freedom. We used the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion to compare different structures of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 241 individuals participated in this study. The original structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire with 16 items and 3 domains was compared to a structure with 14 items and 3 domains. The internal structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire with 14 items showed better fit indices and lower Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion values. CONCLUSION: The best internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in adults presents 3 domains and 14 items.