Immunohistochemical profile, pattern of recurrence, and time to progression of non-metastatic breast cancer patients of the Department of Health-Breast Cancer Medicines Access Program

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains to be the leading cause of malignancy among women and survival rates vary worldwide. Molecular and immunohistochemical (NC) profiling of breast cancer has emerged to improve treatment, which led to 6 different breast cancer subtypes luminal-A, luminal-B, Her-2 enriched, basal-like, daudin low, and normal breast. Essentially, this guides clinicians as to the choice of treatment and prognostication of disease. This study evaluates the characteristics of the different IHC subtypes of breast cancer among Filipinos as to pattern of recurrence and time to progression (TIP) within their 1st 2 years of follow-up.METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, approved by the University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board (UPMREB). Study population included breast cancer patients enrolled in the DOH-BCMAP and managed at the medical oncology clinics of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) and Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center (JRRMMC) from 1 May 2011 to 31 December 2013. Patients' demographics, disease and treatment profile were gathered from the medical charts. Patients were grouped into 12 different IHC subtypes utilizing only IHC staining results of Her2neu, ER and PR. Disease progression/ relapse and time to progression (UP) were primary outcomes analyzed and compared between subtypes using SPSS.RESULTS: There were 368 eligible patients; 50% were >50 years old, 48% postmenopausal, 34% stage IIA, and 94% had invasive ductal carcinoma. About 88% completed their chemotherapy regimen, mostly AC-T. At 1 to 2 years follow-up, 18% had disease progression, mostly distant metastasis, with HER2neu(-)/ER(-)/PR(-), HER2(+), and HER2neu(-)/ER(+)/PR(+) subtypes having the most number of disease progression. The HER2neu(-)/ER(-)/PR(-) subtype had the shortest median TTP (11 months 9sd). HER2(+) subtype had median TTP of 14±8 sd, while HER2neu(-)/ER(+)/PR(+) had median TTP at 11.6±7.41 sd. The median TTPs among the different IHC subtypes were statistically comparable. CONCLUSION: Filipinas with non-metastatic breast cancer after surgery and mainly on adjuvant chemotherapy started to develop disease progression/ relapse within the first 2 years of follow-up; 82% had no relapse. At these early years of follow-up, the median TTPs among the different breast cancer IHC subtypes who went into relapse were comparable, although HER2neu(+) regardless of ER/PR subtype tended to have more disease progression, followed by HER2neu(-)/ ER(-)/ regardless of PR subtype, and then HER2neu(-)/ ER(+)/ regardless of PR subtype. IHC resultant HER2neu(+) regardless of ER/PR and HER2neu(-)/ER(-)/PR(-/+) subtypes can serve as early prognosticators of breast cancer relapse.  

XELOX ± Bevacizumab compared to FOLFOX4 ± Bevacizumab in first line metastatic colorectal cancer in a non-reimbursed health care system: A cost analysis

INTRODUCTION: XELOX is non-inferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This study compares the costs associated with XEL0X+/-bevacizumab versus FOLFOX4+/-bevacizumab in a non-reimbursed, out of pocket Philippine health care system.METHODS: This is a cost-minimization analysis using Philippine General Hospital as base case and a typical Filipino patient of 60 kg with BSA 1.66. The outcome data were derived from the N016966 trial. These included the drugs capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (BEV); chemotherapy cycles and corresponding hospital admission for each regimen; resources associated with treatment of adverse events such hospital days, ambulatory consultations, concomitantmedication, and central venous line insertion/removal, with costs and charges based on the local setting.RESULTS: Highest cost (direct and/or indirect) was for FOLFOX4+BEV, followed by XEL0X+BEV, FOLFOX4, and then XELOX. The use of XELOX resulted in a cost saving of PhP 158,642 per patient compared with FOLFOX4. The use of XEL0X+BEV resulted in a cost saving of PhP 186,144 per patient compared with FOLFOX4+BEV.CONCLUSION: XEL0X+/-BEV is less costly than FOLFOX4-F/-BEV in an out-of-pocket Philippine tertiary hospital setting from the patient's perspective.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in the management of locally advanced rectal carcinoma -- The PGH CRPoCan study group experience 2008-2009

INTRODUCTION: The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) has shown promising results in the management of locally advanced rectal carcinoma, and is associated with improvement in local control, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, these clinical endpoints cannot be properly assessed due to poor follow up among many patients. Other endpoints such as negative circumferential resection margins (CRM), pathologic complete response (pCR) and sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) may serve as indirect means of assessing successful treatment. This study reports the experience of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) Colorectal Polyp and Cancer (CRPoCan) Study Group in using neoadjuvant CRT and TME in the management of locally advanced rectal carcinoma, towards quality care.METHODS: The Integrated Surgical Information System (ISIS) database of the Department of Surgery, PGH was queried for rectal cancer patients with pretreatment clinical stage II and III disease that underwent neo-adjuvant CRT followed by TME between January 2008 and December 2009. The final surgical pathology reports of the subjects were reviewed for treatment response. Response was categorized as: (1) positive or negative CRM; and (2) with or without pCR. The study assessed whether SPS was done.RESULTS: Of 140 potential neoadjuvant CRT patients followed by TME, 82 patients completed the treatment. Thirty two of the patients who completed treatment (39%) were eligible since the other 50 patients (61%) had no post-operative histopathology results. Among those eligible, 10 patients (31%) had pCR. Only 1 patient had a positive CRM. Of the 14 patients whose tumor distance was ?5cm from the anal verge, only 1 patient underwent SPS. The small sample size was mainly attributed to low resources or treatment. Non-availability of post-operative histopathology results was due to poor record keeping. CONCLUSION: The PGH CRPoCan Study Group's use of neoadjuvant CRT followed by TME for locally advanced rectal carcinoma has resulted in acceptable numbers of pCR and clear CRM but has not translated into an increased number of SPS. Despite the limitations of the study, the institutionalization of the multidisciplinary team in the PGH CRPoCan Study Group and the implementation of the ISIS database program are considered the first steps towards quality health care.