Clinical significance of Doppler velocimetry and oligohydramnios in intrauterine growth restriction / 대한산부인과학회지

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to prove the clinical significance by evaluating pregnancy outcomes from intrauterine growth restriction using waves of the Doppler velocimetry of uterine and umbilical artery and amniotic fluid index. METHODS: Throughout the period of January 2000 to May 2005 at our hospital, we reviewed 127 cases diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction after 24 weeks of pregnancy and the existences of diastolic notch of uterine artery (DNUT), absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity of umbilical artery (AEDV) and oligohydramnios were considered abnormal. We set the group that had no abnormal signs as the control group (62 cases), and respectively compared the groups that had oligohydramnios (24 cases), unilateral DNUT (27 cases), bilateral DNUT (10 cases) and AEDV (13 cases) with the control group. And we compared the groups that had only one abnormal sign, that is oligohydramnios (20 cases), bilateral DNUT (7 cases), AEDV (7 cases) and the group showing 2 or more complicated abnormal signs those above (9 cases) with the control group. RESULTS: Perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, lower 5-min Apgar score (A/S), neonatal acidosis, admission rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and perinatal mortality were poor statistically in groups with DNUT, AEDV and oligohydramnios compared to those which have none of these abnormal signs. And those with DNUT had worse results when affected on both sides. And those with AEDV showed worse perinatal outcomes compared to those with bilateral DNUT or oligohydramnios; any overlapping of these abnormal signs indicated worse perinatal outcomes, which had statistic significance. CONCLUSION: Close observation of the fetal well-being by analysis on the wave velocimetry of the blood flow such as the uterine arteries and umbilical arteries and the measurement of the amniotic fluid volume enables predicting the perinatal prognosis of the intrauterine-growth restricted fetuses which may contribute in reducing the perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Clinical comparisons of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and total vaginal hysterectomy / 대한산부인과학회지

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent LAVH and TVH from January 2002 to December 2004 in 00 university hospital without the history of uterine prolapse or pelvic relaxation. We evaluated age, parity, previous abdominal operations, indication of hysterectomy, size of the uterus, operation time, hemoglobin change, hospital day, the degree of postoperative pain and initiation of diet and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The age and parity of the patients in both groups were not different statistically. There were history of previous abdominal operations in 20.8% of LAVH group and 25.3% of TVH group which didn't have statistic significance. Major indications of the operation were uterine myomas in both groups. The average weight of the extracted uterus were 272.9+/-114.5 gm and 225.6+/-87.0 gm in the LAVH group and the TVH group respectively which had significance, and the operation time were 81.1+/-23.4 minutes and 71.1+/-37.8 minutes respectively which had significance. There were no difference in the hemoglobin drop of the postoperative day 1, but the hemoglobin drop of the postoperative day 4 was larger in the LAVH group. Postoperative complications occurred more often in the TVH group (15.2%) than LAVH group (11.9%) but didn't have significance, and the complications were treated by conservative managements and observation of the progress. And also the hospital day, the degree of postoperative pain and initiation of diet had no significance. CONCLUSION: Both LAVH and TVH had no statistic difference in the postoperative morbidity and recuperation. Moreover the indications of operation for both surgeries had no statistic difference, but LAVH had a preference for the larger size of uterus. Furthermore in order to increase the satisfactions of patients and remedy the weak points of procedures, research on the indications and contra-indications between the operative approaches and training on the operative procedures are required.