Effects of lidocaine and esmolol infusions on hemodynamic changes, analgesic requirement, and recovery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations / Efeitos das infusões de lidocaína e esmolol sobre as alterações hemodinâmicas, necessidade de analgésicos e recuperação após colecistectomia laparoscópica

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of lidocaine and esmolol infusions on intraoperative hemodynamic changes, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements, and recovery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. METHODS: The first group (n = 30) received IV lidocaine infusions at a rate of 1.5 mg/kg/min and the second group (n = 30) received IV esmolol infusions at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min. Hemodynamic changes, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements, and recovery characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: In the lidocaine group, systolic arterial blood pressures values were lower after the induction of anesthesia and at 20 min following surgical incision (p < 0.05). Awakening time was shorter in the esmolol group (p < 0.001); Ramsay Sedation Scale scores at 10 min after extubation were lower in the esmolol group (p < 0.05). The modified Aldrete scores at all measurement time points during the recovery period were relatively lower in the lidocaine group (p < 0.05). The time to attain a modified Aldrete score of ≥9 points was prolonged in the lidocaine group (p < 0.01). Postoperative resting and dynamic VAS scores were higher in the lidocaine group at 10 and 20 min after extubation (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively). Analgesic supplements were less frequently required in the lidocaine group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In laparoscopic cholecystectomies, lidocaine infusion had superiorities over esmolol infusions regarding the suppression of responses to tracheal extubation and postoperative need for additional analgesic agents in the long run, while esmolol was more advantageous with respect to rapid recovery from anesthesia, attenuation of early postoperative pain, and modified Aldrete recovery (MAR) scores and time to reach MAR score of 9 points.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Comparar os efeitos de infusões de lidocaína e esmolol sobre as alterações hemodinâmicas no período intraoperatório, a necessidade de analgésicos intra- e pós-operatoriamente e a recuperação após colecistectomia laparoscópica. MÉTODOS: O primeiro grupo (n = 30) recebeu infusões IV de lidocaína a uma taxa de 1,5 mg/kg/min e o segundo grupo (n = 30) recebeu infusões IV de esmolol a uma taxa de 1 mg kg/min. Alterações hemodinâmicas, necessidade de analgésicos no intra- e pós-operatório e características da recuperação foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: No grupo lidocaína, os valores da pressão arterial sistólica foram menores após a indução da anestesia e 20 minutos após a incisão cirúrgica (p < 0,05). O tempo até o despertar foi menor no grupo esmolol (p < 0,001), os escores na escala de Sedação de Ramsay 10 minutos após a extubação foram menores no grupo esmolol (p < 0,05). Os escores de Aldrete modificados em todos os tempos mensurados durante o período de recuperação foram relativamente baixos no grupo lidocaína (p < 0,05). O tempo necessário para atingir um escore de Aldrete ≥ 9 pontos foi prolongado no grupo lidocaína (p < 0,01). Os escores Eva em repouso e em movimento no pós-operatório foram maiores no grupo lidocaína nos minutos 10 e 20 após a extubação (p < 0,05,p < 0,01, respectivamente). Analgésicos suplementares foram necessários com menos frequência no grupo lidocaína (p < 0,01). CONCLUSÃO: Em colecistectomia laparoscópica, a infusão de lidocaína foi superior às infusões de esmolol quanto a suprimir as respostas à extubação traqueal e necessidade de analgésicos adicionais no pós-operatório, enquanto esmolol foi mais vantajoso quanto à rápida recuperação da anestesia, à atenuação da dor no pós-operatório imediato e aos escores de recuperação de Aldrete modificado (RAM) e o tempo até atingir o escore RAM de 9 pontos.

Hemodynamic responses and upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with hypertension: conventional laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway

OBJECTIVES: We compared hemodynamic responses and upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation via conventional laryngoscopy or intubating laryngeal mask airway in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Forty-two hypertensive patients received a conventional laryngoscopy or were intubated with a intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and cis-atracurium. Measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, rate pressure product, and ST segment changes were made at baseline, preintubation, and every minute for the first 5 min following intubation. The number of intubation attempts, the duration of intubation, and airway complications were recorded. RESULTS: The intubation time was shorter in the conventional laryngoscopy group than in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group (16.33 ± 10.8 vs. 43.04±19.8 s, respectively) (p<0.001). The systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group were higher than those in the conventional laryngoscopy group at 1 and 2 min following intubation (p<0.05). The rate pressure product values (heart rate x systolic blood pressure) at 1 and 2 min following intubation in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group (15970.90 ± 3750 and 13936.76 ± 2729, respectively) were higher than those in the conventional laryngoscopy group (13237.61 ± 3413 and 11937.52 ± 3160, respectively) (p<0.05). There were no differences in ST depression or elevation between the groups. The maximum ST changes compared with baseline values were not significant between the groups (conventional laryngoscopy group: 0.328 mm versus intubating laryngeal mask airway group: 0.357 mm; p = 0.754). The number and type of airway complications were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: The intense and repeated oropharyngeal and tracheal stimulation resulting from intubating laryngeal mask airway induces greater pressor responses than does stimulation resulting from conventional laryngoscopy in hypertensive patients. As ST changes and upper airway morbidity are similar between the two techniques, conventional laryngoscopy, which is rapid and safe to perform, may be preferred in hypertensive patients with normal airways.