Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism ; (12): 120-126, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-869999

RESUMO

Objective:To retrospectively analyze distribution characteristics of pathogenic bacteria and their antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis(DFO).Methods:Sixty cases of suspected DFO were collected from the Endocrinology Department of Henan Provincial People′s Hospital. After admission, bone biopsy was carried out to confirm the pathological diagnosis, and the pathogenic bacteria and drug sensitivity were determined by bone culture. In addition, bacterial culture was carried out in the basal tissue of the wound, and the results of bacterial culture were compared with those of bone culture.Results:Sixty patients were diagnosed as DFO after bone biopsy. Among the 60 patients, 45 patients underwent bone culture and basal tissue culture. There are 24 patients of whom the results were consistent, accounting for 53.3%. The positive rate of bone culture was 55.0%, there were 16 strains of gram-positive bacteria and 22 strains of gram-negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus(9 strains) occurrence was the most, common finding, followed by Escherichia coli(6 strains). The course of diabetic foot, albumin(ALB), and antibiotic usage rate before admission were lower in bone culture positive group than those in bone culture negative group, while white blood cell(WBC) and C-reactive protein(CRP) were higher in bone culture negative group( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in gender, age, course of diabetes, HbA 1C, and creatinine(CREA) levels between the two groups( P>0.05). The results of bone culture showed that Staphylococcus aureus was the main Gram-positive bacteria, which was more sensitive to vancomycin, tigecyclin, linezolid, etc. Escherichia coli was the main Gram-negative bacteria, which was more sensitive to tigecyclin, carbapenems, amikacin, etc. Conclusion:Bone biopsy and bone culture should be carried out in cases for suspected DFO patients to identify the pathogenic bacteria, and the bone tissue should be preserved and obtained according to the operation specification before the application of antibiotics, and the appropriate antibiotics should be selected according to the drug sensitivity results.

2.
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism ; (12): 120-126, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-799336

RESUMO

Objective@#To retrospectively analyze distribution characteristics of pathogenic bacteria and their antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis(DFO).@*Methods@#Sixty cases of suspected DFO were collected from the Endocrinology Department of Henan Provincial People′s Hospital. After admission, bone biopsy was carried out to confirm the pathological diagnosis, and the pathogenic bacteria and drug sensitivity were determined by bone culture. In addition, bacterial culture was carried out in the basal tissue of the wound, and the results of bacterial culture were compared with those of bone culture.@*Results@#Sixty patients were diagnosed as DFO after bone biopsy. Among the 60 patients, 45 patients underwent bone culture and basal tissue culture. There are 24 patients of whom the results were consistent, accounting for 53.3%. The positive rate of bone culture was 55.0%, there were 16 strains of gram-positive bacteria and 22 strains of gram-negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus(9 strains) occurrence was the most, common finding, followed by Escherichia coli(6 strains). The course of diabetic foot, albumin(ALB), and antibiotic usage rate before admission were lower in bone culture positive group than those in bone culture negative group, while white blood cell(WBC) and C-reactive protein(CRP) were higher in bone culture negative group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in gender, age, course of diabetes, HbA1C, and creatinine(CREA) levels between the two groups(P>0.05). The results of bone culture showed that Staphylococcus aureus was the main Gram-positive bacteria, which was more sensitive to vancomycin, tigecyclin, linezolid, etc. Escherichia coli was the main Gram-negative bacteria, which was more sensitive to tigecyclin, carbapenems, amikacin, etc.@*Conclusion@#Bone biopsy and bone culture should be carried out in cases for suspected DFO patients to identify the pathogenic bacteria, and the bone tissue should be preserved and obtained according to the operation specification before the application of antibiotics, and the appropriate antibiotics should be selected according to the drug sensitivity results.

3.
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy ; (6): 241-251, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-753828

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the antimicrobial resistance profile of the clinical isolates collected from selected hospitals across China. Methods Twenty-nine general hospitals and five children's hospitals were involved in this program. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out according to a unified protocol using Kirby-Bauer method or automated systems. Results were interpreted according to CLSI 2017 breakpoints. Results A total of 190 610 clinical isolates were collected from January to December 2017, of which gram negative organisms accounted for 70.8% (134 951/190 610) and gram positive cocci 29.2% (55 649/190 610). The prevalence of methicillin-resistant strains was 35.3% in S. aureus (MRSA) and 80.3% in coagulase negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS) on average. MR strains showed much higher resistance rates to most of the other antimicrobial agents than MS strains. However, 91.6% of MRSA strains were still susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while 86.2% of MRCNS strains were susceptible to rifampin. No staphylococcal strains were found resistant to vancomycin. E. faecalis strains showed much lower resistance rates to most of the drugs tested (except chloramphenicol) than E. faecium. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) was identified in both E. faecalis and E. faecium. The identified VRE strains were mainly vanA, vanB or vanM type based on phenotype or genotype. The proportion of PSSP or PRSP strains in the non-meningitis S.pneumoniae strains isolated from children decreased but the proportion of PISP strains increased when compared to the data of 2016. Enterobacteriaceae strains were still highly susceptible to carbapenems. Overall, less than 10% of these strains (excluding Klebsiella spp.) were resistant to carbapenems. The prevalence of imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae increased from 3.0% in 2005 to 20.9% in 2017, and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae increased from 2.9% in 2005 to 24.0% in 2017, more than 8-fold increase. About 66.7% and 69.3% of Acinetobacter (A. baumannii accounts for 91.5%) strains were resistant to imipenem and meropenem, respectively. Compared with the data of year 2016, P. aeruginosa strains showed decreasing resistance rate to carbapenems. Conclusions Bacterial resistance is still on the rise. It is necessary to strengthen hospital infection control and stewardship of antimicrobial agents. The communication between laboratorians and clinicians should be further improved in addition to surveillance of bacterial resistance.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA