RESUMO
Introdução: Estudos prévios analisaram a associação entre fatores de risco cardiovascular (FRCV) associados ao diagnóstico de demência vascular (DV) provável ou possível. No entanto, não foram encontrados estudos que analisassem a associação entre FRCV e a ocorrência de DV definitiva. Dessa maneira, ainda permanece obscura a associação entre os FRCV e a ocorrência de DV definitiva, ou seja, aquela diagnosticada por meio do exame neuropatológico, no qual se apresenta como padrão ouro. Objetivo: Avaliar a associação entre os FRCV e a ocorrência de DV definitiva, pura e mista. Método: Por meio de um estudo transversal foram analisados 707 casos pertencentes à casuística do Banco de Encéfalos Humanos do Grupo de Estudos em Envelhecimento (BEHGEEC) da FMUSP, que respeitaram os critérios de inclusão. A existência de fatores de risco cardiovascular em vida (Hipertensão Arterial, Diabetes Mellitus, Dislipidemia, Tabagismo, Etilismo, Obesidade e Sedentarismo), reportada por um informante com convivido minimamente semanal durante a autópsia, foi associada ao diagnóstico neuropatológico de demência vascular emitido por um neuropatologista. Modelos de regressão logística (sem e com ajuste para sexo, idade e raça) foram construídos para testar a associação entre os FRCV e o diagnóstico de DV, DV pura e DV mista. Foi testada a capacidade preditiva dos fatores que se mostraram preditores de DV por meio da Curva ROC. Resultados: O sedentarismo foi um preditor independente de DV (OR 1,943; IC95% 1,198 3,151; p= 0,007) e DV pura (OR 3,148; IC95% 1,428 6,941;p= 0,004). A HAS foi um preditor independente de DV mista (OR 2,240; IC95% 1,216 4,126; p= 0.01). O sedentarismo não apresentou boa capacidade preditiva para a DV e DV Pura (AUC = 0,380 e 0,337, respectivamente), assim como a HAS para a DV Mista (AUC = 0,459). Conclusões: Dentre os FRCV o sedentarismo e a HAS foram os que se associaram a um aumento no risco de DV.
Introduction: Previous studies have analyzed the association between cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) associated with the diagnosis (probable or possible) of vascular dementia (VaD). However, there are no studies that have analyzed the association between CVRF and the occurrence of definitive VaD. The association between CVRF and the occurrence of definite VaD, neuropathologically defined and considered as gold-standard, remains obscure. Objectives: To evaluate the association between CVRF and the occurrence of definitive VaD, pure and mixed. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study which evaluated 707 cases belonging to the Bain Bank of the Brazilian Aging Brain Study Group (BBBABSG) of FMUSP, respecting the inclusion criteria. The history of existence of cardiovascular risk factors in life (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, alcoholism, obesity, and sedentarism) reported by a knowledgeable next-of-kin, with at least weekly contact with the deceased, was associated with the neuropathological diagnosis of vascular dementia reported by a neuropathologist after the autopsy exam. Logistic regression models (with and without adjustment for sex, age and race) were tested to show the association between CVRF and the diagnosis of VaD, pure Vad and mixed VaD. It was also tested the predictive capacity of the factors that proved to be predictors of VaD through the ROC Curve. Results: Sedentary lifestyle was an independent predictor of VaD (OR 1,943, CI 95% 1,198 - 3,151, p = 0.007) and of Pure VaD (OR 3,148, 95% CI, 1.428 - 6.941, p = 0.004). Hypertension was an independent predictor of Mixed VaD (OR 2,240, 95% CI 1,216 - 4,126, p = 0.01). Sedentary lifestyle did not present good predictive capacity for VaD and Pure VaD (AUC = 0.380 and 0.337, respectively), as Hypertension for Mixed DV did not either (AUC = 0.459). Conclusions: Among the CVRF, sedentarism and hypertension were those associated with an increase VaD risk.
Assuntos
Demência Vascular , Enfermagem , Autopsia , IdosoRESUMO
ABSTRACT.Background: Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for dementia, especially for vascular dementia (VaD), but there is no consensus on diabetes as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other causes of dementia. Objective: To explore the association between diabetes and the neuropathological etiology of dementia in a large autopsy study. Methods: Data were collected from the participants of the Brain Bank of the Brazilian Aging Brain Study Group between 2004 and 2015. Diagnosis of diabetes was reported by the deceased's next-of-kin. Clinical dementia was established when CDR ≥ 1 and IQCODE > 3.41. Dementia etiology was determined by neuropathological examination using immunohistochemistry. The association of diabetes with odds of dementia was investigated using multivariate logistic regression. Results: We included 1,037 subjects and diabetes was present in 279 participants (27%). The prevalence of dementia diagnosis was similar in diabetics (29%) and non-diabetics (27%). We found no association between diabetes and dementia (OR = 1.22; 95%CI = 0.81-1.82; p = 0.34) on the multivariate analysis. AD was the main cause of dementia in both groups, while VaD was the second-most-frequent cause in diabetics. Other mixed dementia was the second-most-common cause of dementia and more frequent among non-diabetics (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Diabetes was not associated with dementia in this large clinicopathological study.
RESUMO. Introdução: Diabetes mellitus é um fator de risco para a demência, especialmente para a demência vascular (DV), mas ainda não há consenso sobre diabetes como fator de risco para a doença de Alzheimer (DA) e outras causas de demência. Objetivo: Verificar a associação entre diabetes e demência e sua etiologia neuropatológica em um grande estudo de autópsia. Métodos: Os dados foram coletados do Banco de Encéfalos Humanos do Grupo de Estudos em Envelhecimento Cerebral da FMUSP entre 2004 e 2015. O diagnóstico de diabetes foi relatado por pelos parentes do falecido. A demência clínica foi estabelecida quando CDR ≥ 1 e IQCODE > 3,41. A etiologia da demência foi determinada pelo exame neuropatológico com imuno-histoquímica. A associação de diabetes com probabilidades de demência foi investigada usando regressão logística multivariada. Resultados: Foram incluídos 1.037 sujeitos, diabetes esteve presente em 279 participantes (27%). A frequência de diagnóstico de demência foi semelhante entre diabéticos (29%) e não diabéticos (27%). Não encontramos associação entre diabetes e demência (OR = 1,22; IC 95% = 0,81-1,82; p = 0,34) na análise multivariada. DA foi a principal causa de demência em ambos os grupos, DV foi a segunda causa em diabéticos. A frequência de outra demência mista foi a segunda causa de demência e mais frequente entre os não diabéticos (p = 0,03). Conclusão: A diabetes não foi associada à demência neste grande estudo clínico-patológico.
Assuntos
Humanos , Demência Vascular , Diabetes Mellitus , Doença de Alzheimer , NeuropatologiaRESUMO
Introduction: Previous studies have analyzed the association between cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) associated with the diagnosis (probable or possible) of vascular dementia (VaD). However, there are no studies that have analyzed the association between CVRF and the occurrence of definitive VaD. The association between CVRF and the occurrence of definite VaD, neuropathologically defined and considered as gold-standard, remains obscure. Objectives: To evaluate the association between CVRF and the occurrence of definitive VaD, pure and mixed. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study which evaluated 707 cases belonging to the Bain Bank of the Brazilian Aging Brain Study Group (BBBABSG) of FMUSP, respecting the inclusion criteria. The history of existence of cardiovascular risk factors in life (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, alcoholism, obesity, and sedentarism) reported by a knowledgeable next-of-kin, with at least weekly contact with the deceased, was associated with the neuropathological diagnosis of vascular dementia reported by a neuropathologist after the autopsy exam. Logistic regression models (with and without adjustment for sex, age and race) were tested to show the association between CVRF and the diagnosis of VaD, pure Vad and mixed VaD. It was also tested the predictive capacity of the factors that proved to be predictors of VaD through the ROC Curve. Results: Sedentary lifestyle was an independent predictor of VaD (OR 1,943, CI 95% 1,198 - 3,151, p = 0.007) and of Pure VaD (OR 3,148, 95% CI, 1.428 - 6.941, p = 0.004). Hypertension was an independent predictor of Mixed VaD (OR 2,240, 95% CI 1,216 - 4,126, p = 0.01). Sedentary lifestyle did not present good predictive capacity for VaD and Pure VaD (AUC = 0.380 and 0.337, respectively), as Hypertension for Mixed DV did not either (AUC = 0.459). Conclusions: Among the CVRF, sedentarism and hypertension were those associated with an increase VaD risk.