Comparison of two questionnaires which measure the health-related quality of life of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients

The objective of the present study was to determine if there is a health-related quality of life (HRQL) instrument, generic or specific, that better represents functional capacity dysfunction in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients. HRQL was evaluated in 20 IPF patients using generic and specific questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), respectively). Functional status was evaluated by pulmonary function tests, 6-min walking distance test (6MWDT) and dyspnea indexes (baseline dyspnea index) at rest and after exercise (modified Borg scale). There was a restrictive pattern with impairment of diffusion capacity (total lung capacity, TLC = 71.5 ± 15.6 percent, forced vital capacity = 70.4 ± 19.4 percent, and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity = 41.5 ± 16.2 percent of predicted value), a reduction in exercise capacity (6MWDT = 435.6 ± 95.5 m) and an increase of perceived dyspnea score at rest and during exercise (6 ± 2.5 and 7.1 ± 1.3, respectively). Both questionnaires presented correlation with some functional parameters (TLC, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity) and the best correlation was with TLC. Almost all of the SGRQ domains presented a strong correlation with functional status, while in SF-36 only physical function and vitality presented a good correlation with functional status. Dyspnea index at rest and 6MWDT also presented a good correlation with HRQL. Our results suggest that a specific instead of a generic questionnaire is a more appropriate instrument for HRQL evaluation in IPF patients and that TLC is the functional parameter showing best correlation with HRQL.

Avaliação do desempenho dos testes functional reach e lateral reach em amostra populacional brasileira / Assessment of performance in the functional reach and lateral reach tests in a Brazilian population sample

OBJETIVOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os padrões de desempenho dos testes Functional Reach e Lateral Reach em uma amostra de indivíduos saudáveis de 20 a 87 anos e verificar a influência do gênero, idade, estatura do indivíduo, peso corporal, comprimentos do braço e do pé. MÉTODO: foi realizado um estudo observacional transversal com 98 pessoas de ambos os gêneros, que residiam na capital e interior de São Paulo. Os voluntários tiveram suas medidas descritivas registradas e posteriormente foram submetidos aos testes Functional Reach e Lateral Reach. RESULTADOS: Para o FR, todas as variáveis tiveram influência, exceto o comprimento do braço (p=0,057), o peso corporal (p=0,746) e a base de suporte usada no momento da avaliação (p=0,384). As variáveis que exerceram maior influência foram o gênero (p=0,001), a idade (p<0,001) e a estatura (p=0,004) do indivíduo. Esta análise mostrou que as mulheres têm um alcance funcional anterior e lateral menor que os homens. Houve uma correlação positiva substancial (r=0,696) entre os valores encontrados no LR à esquerda e à direita. Já o FR teve uma correlação positiva moderada de 0,405 com o LR à esquerda e de 0,614 à direita, sendo então, considerada positiva substancial. Para o LR, as variáveis estatura, peso, comprimentos do braço e do pé não foram significantes na sua determinação. CONCLUSÕES: O padrão de medidas dos testes FR e LR utilizados pela literatura internacional não podem ser os mesmos para os brasileiros. As principais medidas que influenciam os testes são a idade, o gênero e a estatura.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance in the functional reach test (FR) and lateral reach test (LR) among a sample of healthy individuals aged 20 to 87 years and to verify the influence of gender, age, height, body weight, arm length and foot length. METHOD: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 98 people of both genders living in the city of São Paulo and other places in the State of São Paulo. The volunteers were measured and then underwent FR and LR. RESULTS: All the variables had an influence on FR, except arm length (p=0.057), body weight (p=0.746) and the support base used at the time of assessment (p=0.384). The variables exerting greatest influence were the individual's gender (p=0.001), age (p<0.001) and height (p=0.004). This analysis showed that women had less anterior and lateral functional reach than men. There was a substantial positive correlation (r=0.696) between the left and right LR findings. FR had a moderate positive correlation of 0.405 with the left LR and a substantial positive correlation of 0.614 with the right LR. For LR, the height, weight, foot length and arm length variables were not significant determinants. CONCLUSION: The measurement patterns for FR and LR that are used in the international literature may not be the same for Brazilians. The main measurements that influence the tests are age, gender and height.