Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
1.
The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; : 637-646, 2010.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-73305

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus often requires cumbersome supplementary tests. MicroScan Pos Breakpoint Combo Panel Type 28 (PBC28) (Siemens, USA) includes cefoxitin screening to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), inducible clindamycin resistance detection (ICD), and determination of low-range minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (0.5-16 microgram/mL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of PBC28 in comparison with that of Pos Combo Type 1A (PC1A) (Siemens). METHODS: From December 2009 to March 2010, 500 non-duplicate clinical isolates of S. aureus were tested with PC1A and PBC28. Categorical agreements (CA) between the interpretations of the 2 panels were estimated. The presence of the mecA gene was determined by PCR, and double-disk diffusion test (D-test) was performed on the isolates resistant to erythromycin but susceptible or intermediately resistant to clindamycin. Ninety-six isolates representing various vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were tested in parallel with repeat PBC28, broth macrodilution, and epsilometer test (E test). RESULTS: The CA was 99.3% with a very major error (VME) of 0.2%, major error (ME) of 0.1%, and minor error (mE) of 0.4% in total. PBC28 showed 100% CA for 1 isolate with vancomycin MIC of 4 microgram/mL and 35 isolates (7.0%) with MIC of 2 microgram/mL. However, only 15, 27, and 35 isolates with vancomycin MIC of 2 microgram/mL showed 100% CA in repeat PBC28, broth macrodilution, and E test, respectively. PC1A and PBC28 detected all 314 mecA-positive isolates. Among the 63 isolates tested with the D-test, 58 (92.1%) were positive, and the results were 100% concordant with those of ICD. CONCLUSIONS: PBC28 can be appropriate susceptibility testing of S. aureus, including MRSA detection and ICD. However, the lower-range vancomycin MIC test was not reproducible enough to reliably differentiate MIC of 2 microgram/mL from MIC< or =1 microgram/mL.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Cefoxitina/farmacologia , Clindamicina/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA