Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 155-164, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-896379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND@#The delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) by using various carriers has been used to successfully induce bone formation in many animal models. However, the effect of multiple administration of rhBMP2 on bone formation and BMP2 antibody production has not been determined. Our aim was to examine the bone formation activity of rhBMP2 and serum levels of anti-BMP2 antibodies following the repeated administration of rhBMP2 in mice. @*METHODS@#Absorbable collagen sponges or polyphosphazene hydrogels containing rhBMP2 were subcutaneously implanted or injected into one side on the back of six-week-old C57BL/6 mice. Three or 4 weeks later, the same amount of rhBMP2 was administered again with the same carrier into the subcutaneous regions on the other side of the back or into calvarial defects. The effects of a single administration of rhBMP2 on the osteoinductive ability in the ectopic model were compared with those of repeated administrations. In vivo ectopic or orthotopic bone formation was evaluated using microradiography and histological analyses. Serum concentrations of anti-rhBMP2 antibodies were measured by ELISAs. @*RESULTS@#Re-administration of the same amount of rhBMP2 into the subcutaneous area showed a comparable production of ectopic bone as after the first administration. The bone forming ability of repeated rhBMP2 administrations was equal to that of single rhBMP2 administration. The administration of rhBMP2 into calvarial defects, following the first subcutaneous administration of rhBMP2 on the back, completely recovered the defect area with newly regenerated bone within 3 weeks. Repeated administration of rhBMP2 at 4-week intervals did not significantly alter the serum levels of antiBMP2 antibodies and did not induce any inflammatory response. The serum obtained from rhBMP2-exposed mice had no effect on the ability of rhBMP2 to induce osteogenic gene expressions in MC3T3-E1. @*CONCLUSION@#We suggest that the osteoinductive ability of rhBMP2 is not compromised by repeated administrations. Thus, rhBMP2 can be repeatedly used for bone regeneration at various sites within a short duration.

2.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 155-164, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-904083

RESUMO

BACKGROUND@#The delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) by using various carriers has been used to successfully induce bone formation in many animal models. However, the effect of multiple administration of rhBMP2 on bone formation and BMP2 antibody production has not been determined. Our aim was to examine the bone formation activity of rhBMP2 and serum levels of anti-BMP2 antibodies following the repeated administration of rhBMP2 in mice. @*METHODS@#Absorbable collagen sponges or polyphosphazene hydrogels containing rhBMP2 were subcutaneously implanted or injected into one side on the back of six-week-old C57BL/6 mice. Three or 4 weeks later, the same amount of rhBMP2 was administered again with the same carrier into the subcutaneous regions on the other side of the back or into calvarial defects. The effects of a single administration of rhBMP2 on the osteoinductive ability in the ectopic model were compared with those of repeated administrations. In vivo ectopic or orthotopic bone formation was evaluated using microradiography and histological analyses. Serum concentrations of anti-rhBMP2 antibodies were measured by ELISAs. @*RESULTS@#Re-administration of the same amount of rhBMP2 into the subcutaneous area showed a comparable production of ectopic bone as after the first administration. The bone forming ability of repeated rhBMP2 administrations was equal to that of single rhBMP2 administration. The administration of rhBMP2 into calvarial defects, following the first subcutaneous administration of rhBMP2 on the back, completely recovered the defect area with newly regenerated bone within 3 weeks. Repeated administration of rhBMP2 at 4-week intervals did not significantly alter the serum levels of antiBMP2 antibodies and did not induce any inflammatory response. The serum obtained from rhBMP2-exposed mice had no effect on the ability of rhBMP2 to induce osteogenic gene expressions in MC3T3-E1. @*CONCLUSION@#We suggest that the osteoinductive ability of rhBMP2 is not compromised by repeated administrations. Thus, rhBMP2 can be repeatedly used for bone regeneration at various sites within a short duration.

3.
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society ; : 239-245, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-224926

RESUMO

PURPOSE: For easy application to targeted area or in laparoscopic surgery, proper injectable antiadhesive agents are needed. The efficacy of two injectable antiadhesive agents- the thermosensitive poly (organophosphazene) hydrogel (Gel group) and a mixed solution of hyaluronate and carboxymethyl cellulose (Guardix-sol(R), Hanmi Medicare, Korea; Gd group) were compared with that of a positive control (one established membranous agent [Interceed(R), Johnson & Johnson, USA; IC group]) and negative control (phosphate buffered saline, control group). METHODS: Eight ischemic buttons were created on both sides of the peritoneum in twenty-four male Sprague Dawley rats. Each of the solutions, or membrane agent was applied before closing of the wound according to groups (six rats per group). Two rats in the IC group were excluded because of death or intraoperative bleeding. Animals were sacrificed at two or four weeks after surgery. The number of adhesion-forming ischemic buttons and the weight gain were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall number of adhered ischemic buttons were 23 in the control group (n=48), 22 in the Gd group (n=48), 14 in the Gel group (n=48) and 0 in the IC group (n=32). Overall number of adhered ischemic buttons of the Gd group was not significantly different from that of the control group (P=1.000). However that of the Gel group was smaller than that of the control group, although not statistically significant (P=0.093). CONCLUSION: The Gel group demonstrated some possibility of having an antiadhesive effect, and the Gd group failed to show antiadhesive effect, in contrast to IC group. A large-scale preclinical study is required to verify these findings.


Assuntos
Animais , Humanos , Masculino , Ratos , Carboximetilcelulose Sódica , Hemorragia , Hidrogéis , Laparoscopia , Medicare , Membranas , Peritônio , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Aumento de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA