Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Thai Anesthesia Incidents study (THAI Study) is the first national study of anesthesia outcomes during anesthesia practice in Thailand. The authors extracted data of 25,098 pediatric cases from the THAI Study in order to examine the incidence, suspected causes, contributory factors, and suggested corrective strategies associated with anesthesia-related cardiac arrest. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A multi-centered prospective descriptive study was conducted among 20 hospitals across Thailand over a year between March 1, 2003 and February 28, 2004. Data of cardiac arrests in children aged 15 years and younger were collected during anesthesia, in the recovery room and 24 hours postoperative period, and reviewed independently by at least two reviewers. RESULTS: Incidence of anesthesia- related cardiac arrest was 5.1 per 10,000 anesthetics, with 46% mortality rate. Infants accounted for 61% of cases. Incidences of overall cardiac arrest and anesthesia-related arrest were significantly higher in infants than older children and in children with ASA physical status 3-5 than those with ASA physical status 1-2. Most of the anesthesia-related arrests occurred in the operating room (61%) during induction or maintenance of anesthesia (84%). Respiratory-related cardiac arrest was the most common suspected cause of anesthesia-related cardiac arrest. Improving supervision, additional training, practice guidelines, efficient blood bank, equipment maintenance, and quality assurance monitoring are suggested corrective strategies to improve the quality of care in pediatric anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The incidence of anesthesia-related cardiac arrest was 5.1:10,000 anesthetics. Major risk factors were children younger than 1 year of age and ASA 3-5. The identifications of airway management and medication-related problems as the main causes of anesthesia-related cardiac arrest have important implications for preventive strategies.

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) on nerve injury associated with anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) database was used to identify the incidence, outcome and contributing factors of nerve injuries associated with anesthesia in Thai people. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 20 hospital in Thailand from February 1, 2003 to January 31, 2004. All patients underwent anaesthesia were monitored for nerve injuries during the first 24 hours. The details of nerve injuries were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: The overall incidence of nerve injuries associated with anesthesia was 1.6 per 10,000 patients. Considering on spinal and regional anesthesia, the incidence was 5.2 per 10,000 patients. Lumbosacral roots comprised 65.4% of the injuries, the brachial plexus nerve 11.5%, and femoral nerve 7.7%. Contributing factors included type and duration of surgery and regional anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The incidence of nerve injuries associated with anesthesia in Thailand was 1.5 per 10,000 patients. The spinal anesthesia was predominantly associated with injury of lumbosacral root.

Perioperative stroke and coma in Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study).

OBJECTIVES: To analyze perioperative stroke and coma using database of Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) with regard to frequency, contributing factors, preventive and corrective strategies. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Details of perioperative neurological complications comprising stroke and coma in one year were recorded prospectively by attending anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists in standardized record forms. All data were analyzed to identify contributing factors and preventive strategies. RESULTS: Among 172,592 anesthetics, there were 24 cases of coma, and 28 cases of stroke. Most cases of coma that eventually died (12/16 cases, 75%) had ASA physical status (ASA PS) ranging from 2E to 5E. Perioperative stroke was found mainly in patients with ASA PS 3 and most of the incidence (74%) occurred in patients who had no previous history of stroke. These patients already had pre-existing cardiovascular diseases and underwent high risk procedures. There were 54% of perioperative stroke cases that could be due to improper cardiovascular management and 42% due to improper emergency neurological management. CONCLUSION: The incidence of perioperative stroke and coma in this study was approximately 0.03%. The majority of cases had no prior stroke or coma, which suggested that a problem during perioperative period itself might predispose patients to these complications. Preventive strategies included quality assurance activity, improved communication, and practice guideline.

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of perioperative convulsion.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the incidence of perioperative convulsion within 24 hours, outcome, predisposing risk factors, contributing factors related to anesthesia and corrective strategies. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The prospective cohort study enrolled all anesthetics from twenty eligible hospitals in Thailand between March 1, 2003, and February 28, 2004. Postoperative convulsion incidents were extracted from the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) database in terms of demographic data, details of events, outcome, contributing factors related to anesthesia and corrective strategies. RESULTS: The incidence of perioperative convulsion was 3.1 per 10,000 from all 172,592 anesthetics. Most patients (73.59%) recovered in 24 hours. The majority of risk factors were related to surgery (67.92%) and patient factors (54.72%) while anesthesia was the minor factor (30.19%). The contributing factors related to anesthesia were medication error (route, type, time) 43.75% and human error (inadequate care, inadequate knowledge, inadequate communication) 43.75%. The important corrective strategies included improved supervision and clinical practice guideline. CONCLUSION: The incidence of postoperative convulsion was 3.1 per 10000. Anesthesia was the minor contributing factor. The most important risk factors included medication error and human error.

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of anesthetic outcomes: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: The purposes of the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of anesthetic outcomes were to survey patients, surgical, anesthetic profiles and determine factors related to adverse events. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective descriptive study of occurrence screening was conducted in 20 hospitals comprised of 7 university, 4 general and 4 district hospitals across Thailand. Anesthesia personnel were required to fill up patient-related, surgical-related, anesthesia-related variables and adverse outcomes on a structured data entry form. The data were collected during the preanesthetic evaluation, intraoperative period and 24 hr postoperative period. Adverse events specific forms were used to record when they occurred. All data were keyed at data management unit with double entry technique and descriptive statistics was used in the first phase of this study. RESULTS: A total of 163403 consecutive cases were recorded during first 12 months. MD. anesthesiologists involved with 82%, 89%, 45% and 0.2% of cases in university hospitals, regional hospitals, general hospitals and district hospitals respectively. Nurse anesthetists took a major involvement in hospitals run by the Ministry of Public Health. Two-thirds of cases did not receive any premedication (67%) and midazolam was most frequent premedication administered (20%). Common monitoring were non invasive blood pressure (NIBP) (97%), pulse oximetry (96%), electrocardiography (80%), urine output (33%), airway pressure (27%) and capnometry (19%) respectively. The choices of anesthesia were general anesthesia (62%), spinal anesthesia (23%), total intravenous anesthesia (6%), monitor anesthesia care (4%), brachial plexus block (3%) and epidural anesthesia (1%). The adverse events were oxygen desaturation (31.9:10000), cardiac arrest (30.8:10000), death within 24 hr. (28.3:10000), difficult intubation (22.5:10000),re-intubation (19.4:10000), unplanned ICU admission (7.2:10000), coma/cva/convulsion (4.8:10000), equipment malfunction/failure (3.4:10000), suspected myocardial ischemia or infarction (2.7:10000), awareness during anesthesia (3.8:10000), late detected esophageal intubation (4.1:10000), failed intubation (3.1:10000), anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction (2.1:10000), nerve injury (2:10000), pulmonary aspiration (2.7:10000), drug error (1.3:10000), hazard to anesthesia personnel (1.5:10000), unplanned hospital admission (0.1:10000), total spinal block (1.3:10000) and mismatch blood transfusion (0.18:10000) CONCLUSION: Respiratory adverse events were common anesthesia direct related events. High incidence of cardiac arrest and death within 24 hr highlighted concerns for prevention strategies. Incidents of adverse events can be used for institutional quality improvement, educational quality assurance and further research for patient safety in anesthesia.