Analysis of emergency residents health status and affected factors by 2019 Korean Emergency Medicine Resident Survey (KEMRS)

Objective@#Emergency medicine residents are expected to exhibit a poor health status due to excessive working hours and high stress. Because much of patient care depends on them, their health conditions will have a significant impact on patient outcomes. Our study was designed to analyze the health status of emergency medicine residents and the affecting factors using the 2019 Korean Emergency Medicine Residents Survey (KEMRS) results. @*Methods@#The study evaluated the self-rated health-defined percentage of responders who thought they were in good health. Based on this response, the influencing factors were categorized statistically. These factors included personal characteristics, lifestyle (drinking, smoking, eating, sleeping, and exercise), and emotional stress. @*Results@#Of a total of 384 respondents, 176 (46%) thought they were in good health. Participants who perceived themselves to be unhealthy included residents who were married, female, and those in the 3rd grade. Drinking and smoking were not perceived to affect health status, but regular exercise and proper eating patterns were seen to be positive influencing factors. Daytime sleepiness, depressive moods, and personal well-being were correlated with health status. @*Conclusion@#While personal characteristics and emotional problems cannot be changed easily, lifestyle changes can be made for better health. The health conditions of emergency residents have not been considered a matter of importance thus far. To overcome their health problems, responsible improvements in schedules and a program of long-term follow-ups need to be implemented, followed by training programs.

Emergency medicine residents’ needs assessment for education and training using nationwide survey

Objective@#This study was conducted to identify the needs assessment for education and training of emergency medicine (EM) residents. @*Methods@#The results of a national survey of EM residents of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine in 2019 were used. Education was one of the five categories in the survey. The preferred learning methods and their perceived importance and ability to perform in nine competencies were assessed. The Borich’s needs assessment model was used to analyze their needs. @*Results@#Among 591 EM residents, 382 responded, and 371 responses were finally analyzed. Regarding the learning methods, junior residents preferred in-hospital conferences, staff lectures, internet resources, and textbooks. Overall, medical knowledge and procedural skills were the most important, and research was less important to recognize. Medical knowledge showed the highest rank in the needs assessment in all years, and ethics and professionalism showed the lowest ranks. The needs for procedural skills were higher in junior years but lower in senior years. @*Conclusion@#These results will form the basis for the design of training programs to meet the educational needs of EM residents for each grade. Furthermore, an analysis of the educational needs should be done periodically according to the changes and demands of the times.

How many emergency medicine residents reselect their specialty if they could?

Objective@#The 2019 Korean Emergency Medicine Residents Survey (KEMRS) is the first survey by the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM) on the comprehensive satisfaction of their residents. Satisfaction is important not only for the personal well-being of the residents but also for patient safety. @*Methods@#A total of 622 emergency medicine residents were surveyed, using both a paper and email questionnaire from May to August of 2019. Factors related to satisfaction were analyzed. @*Results@#Of the responders, 66% said they would reapply for the emergency specialty and 51% said that they would reselect the same training hospital. The group of residents who said they would choose emergency medicine again felt that their expectations had been met and that they were comfortable with the choice of the specialty. They felt that the factors of satisfaction with their shift schedule and personal health played a more important role in their reselection of the training hospital than the workload. @*Conclusion@#The satisfaction levels of the Korean emergency residents were low. Thus, training hospitals should provide a reasonable working environment to increase their satisfaction. Also, it is important to create an environment where residents can feel rewarded and proud of the work they do.

How many emergency medicine residents reselect their specialty if they could?

Objective@#The 2019 Korean Emergency Medicine Residents Survey (KEMRS) is the first survey by the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM) on the comprehensive satisfaction of their residents. Satisfaction is important not only for the personal well-being of the residents but also for patient safety. @*Methods@#A total of 622 emergency medicine residents were surveyed, using both a paper and email questionnaire from May to August of 2019. Factors related to satisfaction were analyzed. @*Results@#Of the responders, 66% said they would reapply for the emergency specialty and 51% said that they would reselect the same training hospital. The group of residents who said they would choose emergency medicine again felt that their expectations had been met and that they were comfortable with the choice of the specialty. They felt that the factors of satisfaction with their shift schedule and personal health played a more important role in their reselection of the training hospital than the workload. @*Conclusion@#The satisfaction levels of the Korean emergency residents were low. Thus, training hospitals should provide a reasonable working environment to increase their satisfaction. Also, it is important to create an environment where residents can feel rewarded and proud of the work they do.

Satisfaction surveys on major subjects in emergency medical system in Korea: joint investigation of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine and Korean Science Journalists Association

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate satisfaction surveys of the emergency medical system in Korea administered to both members of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine and patients and their guardians. METHODS: The joint survey was conducted by the Korea Scientist Journalists Association and the Public Affairs Committee of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. Questionnaires administered to each group included questions about the general environment, safety, and overcrowding. Satisfaction of medical staffs and awareness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation were only included in the patient questionnaire, while public health was only surveyed in the member questionnaire. The satisfaction was evaluated on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Patient questionnaires were answered by 20 of 413 national emergency medical centers, and about 4.3% of the medical institutions participated in the questionnaire. A total of 704 reply sheets were returned by patients. Member questionnaires were answered by 280 of the 1,108 members (25%). Among patients, the lowest satisfaction was the item of “medical expenses,” followed by “waiting time”. Among providers, the lowest satisfaction was “appropriateness of medical staff”, while the highest complaint was “overcrowding.” CONCLUSION: Emergency care users had the lowest satisfaction with “medical expenses,” while members had the lowest satisfaction with “lack of manpower” and were most dissatisfied with “violence” and “overcrowding.”

Analysis the Change of Recognition and Attitude between Before and After Experience of Emergency Medicine Education Program in Medical School Students

PURPOSE: This study was performed to analyze the results from a 2016 three-day emergency medicine camp for premedical students. METHODS: The Public Relations Committee of Korea Emergency Medical Association planned the camp. We sent an official letter to 41 universities to recruit participants and create programs for three days. Questionnaires were prepared and analyzed before and after the camp. RESULTS: A total of 37 participants participated. There were three times more males than females. According to the recognition survey, knowledge (3.4±2.0 vs. 7.2±1.8) and preference (5.4±1.8 vs. 7.4±1.4) after the camp were better than before the camp (p<0.05). In detail, anxiety about funerals (3.5±2.5 vs. 2.4±2.8) and perception of the role (5.8±2.2 vs. 4.5±2.6) were improved (p<0.05). Worries regarding physical and psychological burden and danger were also greatly improved (p<0.05). The mean satisfaction was 8.6 points out of 10 points, according to the general survey. CONCLUSION: The three-day camp increased awareness of emergency medicine and improved their preferences.

Seizure or Syncope: The Usefulness of Serum Laboratory Tests and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis for Making the Differential Diagnosis

PURPOSE: To determine whether analyte levels in serum laboratory tests and arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA) are helpful for differentiating between generalized seizures and syncope in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Patients over 18 years old who presented to an ED of a tertiary care hospital with a transient loss of consciousness within 4 hours were selected to be in either the seizure (n=166) or syncope groups (n=168). After exclusion for criteria, we used ROC curves to determine AUC, optimal cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity, depending on time (4 hour, 2 hour, 1 hour and 0.5 hour). We also did multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 75 seizure group patients and 78 syncope group patients were studied. There were significant between group differences in total CO2 content, LDH, ammonia, pH, bicarbonate and lactate. AUC (area under the curve) values for blood tests were: 0.720 (tCO2), 0.686 (LDH), 0.737 (ammonia), 0.798 (pH), 0.710 (bicarbonate) and 0.770 (lactate). All AUC values were increased as the time from symptoms to ED arrival was shortened (except for LDH). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, pH (OR=9.587, 95% CI, 2.573-35.723. p=0.001) and ammonia (OR=3.932, 95% CI, 1.324-11.613, p=0.014) were statistically significant independent predictive factors. CONCLUSION: Serum laboratory testing and ABGA, especially serum ammonia and arterial pH, may be helpful for differentiating between generalized seizure and syncope in patients who experience a transient loss of consciousness and who come to the ED within 4 hours after the appearance of symptoms. But further evaluation is needed.