Dry eye module – An application intelligence platform for diagnosing and monitoring dry eye disease

Dry Eye Module (DEM), a software application, was developed to facilitate the streamlining of dry eye evaluation and documentation, to unify diagnostic jargon, and to analyze data input to generate a dry eye diagnostic report. This diagnostic report generated is based on the current understanding of dry eye diagnostic algorithms (Dry Eye Workshop 2 [DEWS2]/Asia Dry Eye Society [ADES]). Apart from its plausible role in aiding unprecedented multicentric dry eye demographic data collection, the application software can generate a customized referral letter to the rheumatologist, highlighting the salient ophthalmic features to be shared. DEM uses schematic illustrations to depict eyelid, conjunctival, and corneal parameters that impact the ocular surface in dry eyes that can be captured and compared during serial visits. Furthermore, DEM displays a symptom sign trend chart that graphically represents improvement/stability or worsening of the subjective and objective dry eye status. DEM can generate a curated prescription using preloaded advice templates. DEM includes facility for state-of-the-art advanced dry eye diagnostic reporting for super specialty use. The addition of DEM to the dry eye diagnostic armamentarium would help bridge the current unmet needs of dry eye evaluation. These are lack of uniform reporting, lack of multicentric data on a unified platform, the inability to ensure complete evaluation, inability to avoid lacunae during follow-up visits, and the lack of a simple patient-ophthalmologist and an ophthalmologist–rheumatologist interface.

Imaging modalities in keratoconus.

Diagnosis of keratoconus has greatly improved from simple clinical diagnosis with the advent of better diagnostic devices like corneal topographers based on placido disc, elevation based topographers and lately optical coherence tomography (OCT). These instruments are quite sensitive to pick up early keratoconus, which could help refractive surgeons to avoid serious complications like ectasia following keratorefractive surgeries. Each of these instruments has their advantages and disadvantages; in spite of that each one of them has its own place in the clinical practice. Currently, placido disc based topographers are the most commonly used topographers all over the world. There are many different companies making such devices, which follow the different techniques and color for the display. Due to these differences they are not directly comparable to each other. Various quantitative indices based on these topographers have been suggested and validated by different authors to aid in the diagnosis and quantification of keratoconus. OCT with its higher resolution and deeper penetration has created its place in the diagnostic armamentarium for keratoconus.